Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > Astronomy Books and Media
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:00 PM
edwardsdj's Avatar
edwardsdj (Doug)
Doug Edwards

edwardsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Sure many of the systems used back then, particularly digital ones, were very crude by todays standards, but they worked, and even more importantly the people used them understood how they worked.
I read somewhere (I think it was an article in IEEE Spectrum) years ago that the person who originally proposed the lunar module envisaged a manually throttled descent engine (which they kept) and a plumb bob hanging from the ceiling of the module (which they replaced with instruments and computers).

We are so reliant on computers these days that people forget what amazing feats were accomplished without them.

On another note, the computer in a mobile phone is really very complex. I would have described the computers used in the Apollo missions as little more than simple programmable calculators, used to automate repetitive calculations that otherwise would have been done with a slide rule, pen and paper.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-02-2008, 10:20 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
The doco was about the Apollo missions, that was enough for me to watch.
Sure todays laptops and computers and mobile phones are great. But not many would understand them to a level were the could tell you every little detail about them. For example where the resolved the 1202 problem, did you see that sheet. Every possible problem had been documented. A simple error in MS windows is fobbed off with oh that normal just click ok and ignore it. Memory management is so crap in modern OS's.
Or for example during Apollo 13 the power-up procedures (accredited to Mattingly in the film). Such engineers have to know there systems inside out. I had a professor who told us about the days when they had to repair there calculators, yet we live in the days were we can almost dispose such things and replace them cheaply. Working in IT i have come accros the situation time and again were i have no choice but to format and start from scratch, because there is not enough information about the problem to fix it. Partly this is because not every combination of things can be tested for by every vendor. But this is exactly what the engineers at NASA did do, they new those "real-time" systems inside out.

Regards
Fahim
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 13-02-2008, 03:20 PM
Outbackmanyep's Avatar
Outbackmanyep
Registered User

Outbackmanyep is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Walcha , NSW
Posts: 1,652
[quote=Omaroo;296381]"The Untold Story" - when I heard the narrators' voice my expectations went out the window - "oh no, not him". Since when has the ABC bought garbage from the Discovery channel to supplement its science content?

I'm sorry to say that I was disappointed in this show. It was narrated in the same softly-spoken doom and gloom Discovery Channel-esque style that I dislike "Seconds From Disaster" for, and was aimed at an audience that has otherwise no interest or knowledge in space, and particularly the Apollo era.
[quote]

I totally agree!!!! I HATE the way they tell the story on "Seconds From Disaster" , then re-hash it 5 minutes later ....over and over....
I would have preferred Sam Neill to do the narration!
The UFO thing was hype! As you may well know, one of the other Apollo mission actually had a Saturn V stage follow them and crash on the moon, all intended no doubt!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 14-02-2008, 09:54 AM
goober's Avatar
goober (Doug)
No obs, raising Harrison

goober is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 796
I finally caught up with the "Untold Story"? The only thing I didn't know was the UFO, which I am sure must have a logical explanation - surely it had to be part of the discarded stack post docking with the LEM. The rest of it ... the pen, the flashes in the eyes, the 1201/2 overflow alarms, the escape tower, etc - all been told before. The narrator's slightly breathless style was a bit much.

Roll on March 6th ...
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 14-02-2008, 10:23 AM
merlin8r's Avatar
merlin8r
Astro Shop Minion

merlin8r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mount Colah
Posts: 190
Not too long ago, the Discovery Channel ran a series of excellent Apollo doco's. I just wish I could remember what any of them were called! Specifically they dealt with the missions through the eyes of the mission controllers, and it was refreshing to see many of the unsung heroes. Of particular note.....every year many of them gather for drinks and reminiscing, and always the conversation turns to The Fire....and they all become very solemn for several minutes, and nobody says anything. But the biggest picture I got from any of them, was how awesome Gene Kranz would be as a boss. The man just exudes confidence, and brings the best out of his men. And before the Apollo 11 landing attempt, he delivered a speech that ended with "No matter what, we all walk out of this room as a team", that ALL of his staff could recite verbatim to this day.
Edit: The show was called "Failure is not an Option", and was on the History Channel, not Discovery.

Last edited by merlin8r; 14-02-2008 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 02:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement