ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 20.4%
|
|

30-07-2014, 11:56 AM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
NZ Rockets ..
I've been watching this company for a few years since even before their earlier Mercury Island launchings of what seemed to be oversized amateur hardware but looks like they had a plan all along. Quite stunning to say the least.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11301045
Bit more info
http://www.rocketlabusa.com/
|

30-07-2014, 12:51 PM
|
 |
Gravity does not Suck
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
|
|
Wow
That must make you proud
Great stuff
|

30-07-2014, 01:06 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Dunners Nu Zulland
Posts: 1,786
|
|
Finding a launch site in NZ shouldn't be too hard, as long as it blasts off on November 5!
|

30-07-2014, 01:16 PM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
It's a great looking concept, and a good idea as there's obviously a great market for ~100kg and/or cubesat LEO launchers, especially ones that aren't bound to the timescales nessesary for larger, more expensive launches
The stuff.co.nz article I read about it in this morning mentioned that they had completed one orbital launch previously, with a different rocket of course, but I can only seem to find info about sub-orbital launches they've conducted.
Just a case of stuff.co.nz getting confused? or have they actually done an orbital launch?
I think with all the reading around this subject I've done that I would have come across something as significant as Kiwis launching a satellite!
|

30-07-2014, 02:58 PM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
An Atea II if I remember correctly was orbital. They have not been blasting their trumpet very much even over here. Been quite a few launches from Mercury Island ( NE aspect for orbital stuff ) but no news. It's all been rather hush hush as they got to the 'big boy' stage.
No satelite on the orbital btw, just dummy payload and tracking electronics.
|

30-07-2014, 03:04 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
|
|
Plus, everyone knows that the Kiwi is a flightless bird.
Gary
|

30-07-2014, 03:20 PM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID
No satelite on the orbital btw, just dummy payload and tracking electronics.
|
I would still call that a satellite
However I still can't find any reference to an orbital flight from NZ anywhere in my searches. The Atea II couldn't have acheived orbital velocity as, according to these pages, it's designed to lob a 25kg payload to a 250km apogee:
http://www.kiwispace.org.nz/display/PORTAL/Rocket+Lab
http://www.astronautix.com/lvs/atea2.htm
Of course that's significantly less speed than is needed to achieve orbit.
Don't get me wrong, what they've done is awesome and if they manage to build and launch the new Electron rocket then that's even more awesome. It's a beautiful looking rocket, makes me want to re-skin KSP in all Carbon Fibre
|

30-07-2014, 03:30 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
|
|
I understood that launch sites on or close to the equator are more energy efficient due to the Earth's rotational velocity (hence ESA doing Ariane/Soyuz launches from Kourou in South America, NASA at the Cape etc).
I would have thought NZ is a bit far South.
Polar orbit launches, however, are a different matter.
Dean
|

30-07-2014, 03:50 PM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanm
I understood that launch sites on or close to the equator are more energy efficient due to the Earth's rotational velocity (hence ESA doing Ariane/Soyuz launches from Kourou in South America, NASA at the Cape etc).
I would have thought NZ is a bit far South.
Polar orbit launches, however, are a different matter.
Dean
|
At the equator the ground is moving 1669km/h or 463m/s
I think they launch from 36 deg south so at that latitude the ground is moving 1350km/h or 375m/s
At their planned orbital altitude of 500km the orbital velocity is 7615m/s so the saving would be around 1% if they moved to the equator.
36 degrees is still a lot less than the 45 degrees latitude at which Baikonur lies and the Soviets/Russians didn't do too badly when it comes to spaceflight
Last edited by pluto; 30-07-2014 at 04:20 PM.
|

30-07-2014, 04:31 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 818
|
|
Fair enough & well said, Pluto.
Can't argue with real numbers!
Dean
|

31-07-2014, 09:34 AM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
Also where NZ is located is a good insertion location for angular orbits like ISS has. Low air traffic in the area is also useful plus failure path is over the empty lower Pacific. Safety First ..
I'll see what I can confirm re the orbital note. I have some contacts that are a bit closer to the source. I used to do amateur rocketry till the neighbours complained about the test motor failure explosions in the back yard.
|

05-08-2014, 09:10 AM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
Dr Sandy Tirtey, vehicle team leader for this project is speaking at Auckland Astronomical Society next Monday night. He was the Technical Lead & Project Manager for the Scramspace I Scramjet free flight experiments in 2013.
I won't mention that he's an Aussie from University of Queensland ... Ooops !
I have a couple of questions I'd like to put to him ....
I'm taking Fri & Mon off, doing a bit of a Northland Drive so I won't be around to annoy you all. Long as I'm back in time for the meeting.
|

05-08-2014, 12:11 PM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Excellent, that should be really interesting!
|

12-08-2014, 06:20 AM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
So that was the most noninformational informational meeting I have ever attended. ie he gave little away. He spoke and showed information mostly about the Australian based ScamSpace project, very little about RocketLab NZ.
Frustrating..
But .... to update.
(1) No, they have not orbitted anything yet but have attained 120km altitude repeatedly and fired over 80 successful launches. Saw some interesting videos of various tests.
(2) Sandy is Belgian, has worked on several incomplete Scram projects including the Australian one. All were killed due to either funding issues or in the Australian case, destruction of the test vehicle at launch.
(3) The cojoining factors in all projects is cost to launch. All projects he has worked had the ultimate target of making space affordable for smaller operators. Rocketlabs NZ is the first to be ready to acheive that.
I buttonholed him after and 'accused' him of not saying much about the NZ project. He laughed and agreed, showed a test firing of the Rutherford engine on video which was extremely impressive. ( It shifted the vid cam back about 6 meters and it was attached to some heavy metal ). He gave a hint when asked, that the name, Electron, had something to do with the new technology and thus the patents and secrecy on the project.
He wasn't giving much away.
But had a long chat with another interesting character about historical aircraft and technology. So a good night regardless.
My long weekend was excellent except for the the fact I had a full on head cold the whole time and it's still hanging around .... bleghh !
Few pix over on the weebly website (link below) if anyone is interested
|

12-08-2014, 07:20 AM
|
Prince Planet
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
|
|
Pretty cool. Pity Australia didn't push home it's location advantage
|

12-08-2014, 09:35 AM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterEde
Pretty cool. Pity Australia didn't push home it's location advantage
|
There were a few orbital launches and many sub-orbital launches from Woomera, though not with Australian designed/built rockets.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Australia was the third country in the world to launch it's own satellite from it's own soil, I think using a Redstone.
|

12-08-2014, 09:50 AM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pluto
There were a few orbital launches and many sub-orbital launches from Woomera, though not with Australian designed/built rockets.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Australia was the third country in the world to launch it's own satellite from it's own soil, I think using a Redstone.
|
Hmm, never heard of the Redstone launch, have to check. How long ago was that ?
The Scramspace launch was in Norway because Aust Govt refused launch permission in Nov 2013, he didn't elaborate why. Possibly because of the trajectory (straight down) not being over water.
UK was using WAC Corporals at Woomera IIRC but not sure about that.
More stuff to look up... 
Better go google Woomera see what I can find.
OK, Black Knight\Blue Streak launch vehicles. Haven't heard those names in a long time. Last Satellite launch in 1971.
Lot of missile testing, Rapier, Bloodhound etc.
Last edited by ZeroID; 12-08-2014 at 09:54 AM.
Reason: More stuff
|

12-08-2014, 10:06 AM
|
 |
Astro Noob
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,982
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID
Hmm, never heard of the Redstone launch, have to check. How long ago was that ?
The Scramspace launch was in Norway because Aust Govt refused launch permission in Nov 2013, he didn't elaborate why. Possibly because of the trajectory (straight down) not being over water.
UK was using WAC Corporals at Woomera IIRC but not sure about that.
More stuff to look up... 
Better go google Woomera see what I can find.
OK, Black Knight\Blue Streak launch vehicles. Haven't heard those names in a long time. Last Satellite launch in 1971.
Lot of missile testing, Rapier, Bloodhound etc.
|
The Encyclopdeia Astronautica is even better than Google for these things:
http://www.astronautix.com/sites/woomera.htm
And I was mistaken, there were Australian designed rockets though only sub-orbital.
|

12-08-2014, 10:46 AM
|
Prince Planet
|
|
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Albert Park, Adelaide
Posts: 694
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pluto
There were a few orbital launches and many sub-orbital launches from Woomera, though not with Australian designed/built rockets.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that Australia was the third country in the world to launch it's own satellite from it's own soil, I think using a Redstone.
|
There was a US company (Kistler) setup in Woomera to start launches as recent as 15 years or less. But went broke I think.
Even Branson was considering Australia as a launch site for Starship
|

12-08-2014, 02:17 PM
|
 |
Lost in Space ....
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
|
|
Cool, all fascinating stuff. I recently downloaded a free book on the X-15 another of my favourite 'planes'. Some very interesting data came out of that program as well.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:06 AM.
|
|