Galaxy NGC 1808

LucasB (Lucas) · #1 18-02-2014, 11:48 PM

Hi Everyone,

Bought myself a second hand RC8 Carbon Fibre and thought I better give the longer focal length a test run. I thought a small mag 10 galaxy approx 7'x 7' from a Bortle 6 Red zone would be a reasonable test so here it is.
Image details :
GSO RC8 CF, QHY9M, Baader R 18x300s, G 18x300s, B 18x420s all bin 2x2 , Synth L created in IRIS.

Comments Welcome,
Thanks for looking,
Lucas

gregbradley · #2 18-02-2014, 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstroAussie

Hi Everyone,

Bought myself a second hand RC8 Carbon Fibre and thought I better give the longer focal length a test run. I thought a small mag 10 galaxy approx 7'x 7' from a Bortle 6 Red zone would be a reasonable test so here it is.
Image details :
GSO RC8 CF, QHY9M, Baader R 18x300s, G 18x300s, B 18x420s all bin 2x2 , Synth L created in IRIS.

Comments Welcome,
Thanks for looking,
Lucas

Very nice Lucas.

Greg.

strongmanmike (Michael) · #3 19-02-2014, 12:01 AM

Nice colours Lucas

The new scope under less than ideal conditions is doing a pretty good job there.

Love the red wisps rising from the galaxy core area

Mike

allan gould · #4 19-02-2014, 11:31 AM

Good catch, reminds me of a mini-me M82.
Thanks for posting.
Allan

RickS (Rick) · #5 19-02-2014, 12:33 PM

Nice image, Lucas! That's a great first light.

LucasB (Lucas) · #6 19-02-2014, 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gregbradley

Very nice Lucas.
Greg.

Thanks Greg!

Quote:

Originally Posted by strongmanmike

Nice colours Lucas

The new scope under less than ideal conditions is doing a pretty good job there.
Love the red wisps rising from the galaxy core area
Mike

Thanks Mike. I might go 1x1 to try and get some more detail but the seeing is a little limited at the moment.

Quote:

Originally Posted by allan gould

Good catch, reminds me of a mini-me M82.
Thanks for posting.
Allan

It certainly has that feel about it for sure. Thanks Allan.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RickS

Nice image, Lucas! That's a great first light.

Thanks Rick. It's a sort of equal first light really. First night I got half the data for this shot and about 2 hours of NGC2280. While I was collecting the second half of this shot I processed the NGC2280 in between.

alpal · #7 19-02-2014, 07:12 PM

Hi Lucas -
your result is so much better than mine -
you actually got those faint galaxy arms -
well done.

cheers
Allan

atalas · #8 21-02-2014, 05:23 PM

Very nice work Lucas!well done.

LucasB (Lucas) · #9 21-02-2014, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpal

Hi Lucas -
your result is so much better than mine -
you actually got those faint galaxy arms -
well done.
cheers
Allan

Thanks Allan. I must admit you did give me the idea for the target after I saw your post. Funny I am sure I left a comment about your M42 image which was a beauty but something must have happened. With more data collected I am positive you would end up with a very nice image too!

Quote:

Originally Posted by atalas

Very nice work Lucas!well done.

Thanks Louie! Glad you liked it!

alpal · #10 22-02-2014, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstroAussie

Thanks Allan. I must admit you did give me the idea for the target after I saw your post. Funny I am sure I left a comment about your M42 image which was a beauty but something must have happened. With more data collected I am positive you would end up with a very nice image too!

Hi Lucas,
I have 2 versions of M42 on my flickr photos &
I don't know which one to delete or whether to start again.

My data on NGC 1808 was a bit out of focus & not that good.
I really need to revisit it from a dark site.

BTW - your NGC 1808 is flipped - a mirror image!
I wonder what Mike could do with this target?
It's too late this year - maybe next year?

cheers
Allan

LucasB (Lucas) · #11 22-02-2014, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alpal

BTW - your NGC 1808 is flipped - a mirror image!
I wonder what Mike could do with this target?
It's too late this year - maybe next year?

Thanks the heads up Allan. I am not that good with orientation I just go for what sort of looks nice. If you could give me a tip or two on getting the correct orientation I would appreciate it! I reckon Mike would go very well on this target with his photon sucker. Martin Pugh has also done 20hrs on this target and his version is breathtaking.

LucasB (Lucas) · #12 22-02-2014, 06:12 PM

I should probably clarify. I can get the rotation correct by uploading to astrobin and getting the orientation it's just mirror image which I am not that good with.

alpal · #13 22-02-2014, 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstroAussie

I should probably clarify. I can get the rotation correct by uploading to astrobin and getting the orientation it's just mirror image which I am not that good with.

In Photoshop:
image
image rotation
flip canvas vertical

I'll have to try & find that 20 hour image.

cheers
Allan

LucasB (Lucas) · #14 22-02-2014, 10:25 PM

I know how to manipulate it in photoshop what I am a little uncertain of is how to recognise the image is actually mirror flipped in the first place. Can you use planetarium software? For Martin's image search for NGC1808 here or type Martin Pugh NGC 1808 into google.
Lucas

alpal · #15 22-02-2014, 11:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AstroAussie

I know how to manipulate it in photoshop what I am a little uncertain of is how to recognise the image is actually mirror flipped in the first place. Can you use planetarium software? For Martin's image search for NGC1808 here or type Martin Pugh NGC 1808 into google.
Lucas

Just found Martin's image -
what do you know - it's also flipped - a mirror image.
see here:
http://www.martinpughastrophotograph...es/NGC1808.jpg

I checked in World Wide Telescope
This is what is there: