Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-06-2013, 03:43 PM
Greg Bock's Avatar
Greg Bock (Greg Bock)
Registered User

Greg Bock is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 377
A supermoon and normal moon comparison

HI all,
Just to put some perspective on the subject,here's a comparison of the Supermoon of June 23 2013 at 358,000 km, with a 'normal' moon taken on 4 th March, 2007 at 403,000km.
In this case, it shows the 'Supermoon' diameter at 11% larger than the 'normal' moon.

I took both images with the same scope,an Intes MN61 with a 6" mirror at F6.
The 2007 image was taken with my 350D,and the 2013 image was taken with my 450D.
Since the cameras have different sized pixels, I adjusted one to match the pixel size of the other.

I hope you enjoy it.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Supermoon Comparison 3 March 2007 to 24 June 2013 1800x834 noted 80pc.jpg)
183.5 KB88 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-06-2013, 04:38 PM
noeyedeer (Matt)
Registered User

noeyedeer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: gold coast
Posts: 553
very nice comparison Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-06-2013, 05:21 PM
Phoenix's Avatar
Phoenix (Steve)
Happy Sensing!

Phoenix is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 243
Yep, nice work - like it.

Cheers
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 25-06-2013, 06:34 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Great comparison images Greg.
We'll have to pull them out next "super" Moon.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 25-06-2013, 06:50 PM
RobF's Avatar
RobF (Rob)
Mostly harmless...

RobF is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,735
Nice work Greg. That looks like 20% almost at a quick glance. Certainly enough of a difference to seem a bit bigger in the sky by eye you'd expect.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-06-2013, 07:04 PM
StephenM's Avatar
StephenM (Stephen)
Registered User

StephenM is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,399
That shows the comparison nicely, Greg.

Cheers,
Stephen
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-06-2013, 07:19 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Very cool. Bigger difference than what I thought.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-06-2013, 11:46 PM
Greg Bock's Avatar
Greg Bock (Greg Bock)
Registered User

Greg Bock is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 377
thx all, i checked the diameters on both images, and yup, 11%.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement