Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
The second one is my favourite too, lovely.
The 3rd one certainly has a strong green bias. It overwhelms the sky! Is the colour balance the same between the three?
|
Yes it was on auto white balance. I took some images with the Nikon D800E that night as well. They also showed strong green air glow. I guess some nights its just really strong.
I prefer the 2nd one also. The panorama is too warped and not enough variance in colour. After seeing your wonderful pano with the hills in the foreground I now feel a strong interesting foreground element is important in these panoramas to anchor the shot and make it make more sense and more real.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larryp
Definitely the second one 
|
Thanks Larry. The image is also de-fisheyed using a software plug in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by spacezebra
No 2 for me. Cheers Petra d.
|
Thanks Petra. I also have a 2 or 3 time lapses that turned out well later that night.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G
Nice photos Greg.
I really like the 3rd one that shows foreground detail.
The Sony NEX seems to be working really well and those lenses have such a wide FOV. Good luck with it.
I nearlly bought an NEX, but instead fell into the "dark side" and bought a second hand Canon 5D mk1...fingers crossed!
Ross.
|
A full frame camera is hard to beat. 5D started the whole revolution. It has larger pixels so that should be an advantage. The Nex is good but at the end of the day its a noticeably less than a Nikon D800E or a Canon 5D3, 6D or 1DX. A Metabones Speedbooster though would narrow the gap but then you are back to 6D, D600 type prices and full frame.
Greg.