Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 20-06-2012, 11:43 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Lagoon and Trifid area in near infrared

It's been a while since I've used the Astrodon near infrared filters and I thought a FSQ shot of the Lagoon and Trifid area would be nice. The composition is a bit unusual I suppose but I wanted the maximum attention on the Lagoon.

Cheers

Steve

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/m8_IR_STL11K_FSQ.htm
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 20-06-2012, 12:16 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Thanks for that view Steve, really unusual.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20-06-2012, 07:41 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
No problem Allan
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20-06-2012, 09:09 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Very interesting Steve, and amazing how half of the Lagoon just disappears in IR.
I've thought of getting the NIR filter set, but I don't think it comes in 31mm unmounted for the QSI? I really must look into this again. Thanks for showing this inspiring image.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 20-06-2012, 09:37 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Great shot Steve.

Shows lots of detail.

Unusual and nice.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21-06-2012, 10:07 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G View Post
Great shot Steve.

Shows lots of detail.

Unusual and nice.

Ross.
Thanks Ross

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyViking View Post
Very interesting Steve, and amazing how half of the Lagoon just disappears in IR.
I've thought of getting the NIR filter set, but I don't think it comes in 31mm unmounted for the QSI? I really must look into this again. Thanks for showing this inspiring image.
Thanks Rolf. It's certainly a different look. Unfortunately you are correct about the 31mm filters. I just checked the website and the filters are only available in 1.25" and 50mm.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 21-06-2012, 10:17 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Interesting Steve.

Here is an animated gif of your image and one of mine in visible 4MB

http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co...06/steveIR.gif


It really shows the differences.


Bert
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 21-06-2012, 10:32 AM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by avandonk View Post
Interesting Steve.

Here is an animated gif of your image and one of mine in visible 4MB

http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co...06/steveIR.gif


It really shows the differences.


Bert
Thanks Bert - it certainly does bring out the difference. I did a similar thing when I shot M8 in IR through the RC.

http://members.pcug.org.au/~stevec/m8_mouse_over.htm
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21-06-2012, 01:56 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
very interesting. I note some stars look so much brighter in IR, no doubt the cooler ones, or rather cool stars with atmospheres blocking shorter wavelengths.
Scott
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 21-06-2012, 04:57 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by tornado33 View Post
very interesting. I note some stars look so much brighter in IR, no doubt the cooler ones, or rather cool stars with atmospheres blocking shorter wavelengths.
Scott
Certainly IR puts a new light on things. Generally the longer the wavelength the less objects look like they do in visible. Spitzer shots of the Trifid have the dust lanes looking bright
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 22-06-2012, 12:29 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Ah huh! who's got the IR filter out again looking for more undiscovered globulars, huh? ...nice article in AS&T too by the way.

Cool shot...Good luck

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 22-06-2012, 02:03 PM
Stevec35 (Steve)
Registered User

Stevec35 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Ah huh! who's got the IR filter out again looking for more undiscovered globulars, huh? ...nice article in AS&T too by the way.

Cool shot...Good luck

Mike
Thanks Mike. I think it would have to be a pretty big globular to be visible at this focal length but you never know.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 22-06-2012, 07:55 PM
SkyViking's Avatar
SkyViking (Rolf)
Registered User

SkyViking is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Waitakere Ranges, New Zealand
Posts: 2,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stevec35 View Post
Thanks Rolf. It's certainly a different look. Unfortunately you are correct about the 31mm filters. I just checked the website and the filters are only available in 1.25" and 50mm.
Yeah it's a pity. But I'm getting a Clear filter soon to compliment my L filter, and I figure Clear minus L should give an IR/UV view, so at least I can try that.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement