Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-06-2011, 10:23 AM
Draconis (Mick)
Registered User

Draconis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 66
Experimenting in Widefield - Milky Way

Hi All, I've been experImenting with my Canon 500D and EF 50mm f/1.8 lens and trying to capture some widefield milky way shots . I've been frustrated for the last few weeks in trying to get a result i'd be happy posting here especially seeing some of the recent shots posted in the main astrophotography section.

I started out with 30sec exposures and was getting trailing stars, weird colours of blue and purple while processing in CS3 and my focus was horrible. I do have a mount that is capable of tracking (thanks to a very kind member of this site) but wanted to figure out the basics of capturing a decent image on a fixed tripod first before I start dabbling in tracked shots and I think i'm starting to get there. The images attached were taken on Sat 25th June 2011 and are a massive improvement on the results that I have previously got out of the camera.

I'm a complete novice when it comes to processing too so I've just been mucking around in DSS and CS3 to get to a point where i think the images look ok.

The details of these 2 images are:

Canon 500D
F4.5
Auto White Balance
10 x 8sec exposures run through DSS with darks too.
ISO 3200
Also run through Noiseware noise reduction software (no idea which settings to use though, jusy hit and hope)



Any processing advice or comments appreciated, thanks for looking.

Cheers.
Mick
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Antares 26062011 Resized 2.JPG)
158.8 KB79 views
Click for full-size image (Galactic Centre 26062011 Resized 2.JPG)
194.8 KB101 views

Last edited by Draconis; 26-06-2011 at 10:25 AM. Reason: forgot to mention noise reduction software
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-06-2011, 10:51 AM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Very good first attempts
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-06-2011, 11:32 AM
Draconis (Mick)
Registered User

Draconis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 66
Thanks, Carl
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-06-2011, 08:58 PM
Draconis (Mick)
Registered User

Draconis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 66
This is addictive work, I spent the afternoon playing with this and I think I have improved the original posted above...got a few reality checks on on how good my image is after trawling through old postings of other members efforts of similar images and I cant get mine anywhere near some of the unbelievable pics others have posted.

I reprocessed in DSS running 30 x 8sec exposures through instead of 10. I had shot a few sets at ISO 1600 and ISO 3200 and wasnt sure if I could combine them in DSS, seems its not a problem.

Im enjoying the trial trial and error aspect of processing the raw data and discovering what different settings do in CS3, very very addictive stuff.

Mick
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Milky Way 2.1 Resize.jpg)
144.2 KB76 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-06-2011, 12:01 AM
midnight's Avatar
midnight (Darrin)
Always on the road

midnight is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Australind, WA
Posts: 891
Mick the purple/blue around the stars could be UV being seen as blue/purple and an "L" filter (which is an IR/UV blocking filter) may solve that. I have just bought one and will experiment on my 40D.

That's my understanding anyway but I am still getting my feet wet too.

F4 is a good choice (some go to F5.6 on that lense) but ISO3200 is a bit high if you can track and go for something longer than 60 sec at least.

If you have obvious light pollution issues, try and capture as close to overhead as possible. I found significant quality improvements this way in terms of LP.

Good luck,
Darrin...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-07-2011, 11:05 AM
Poita (Peter)
Registered User

Poita is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NSW Country
Posts: 3,586
What is the benefit of using a higher f-stop for the photos?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-07-2011, 12:01 PM
NorthernLight's Avatar
NorthernLight (Max)
Settled

NorthernLight is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 343
Hi Peter,

usually to avaoid the distortions of wide lenses and coma at the edges as well as creating spikes around the stars.

However, unguided images donīt benefit of it as either ISO (noise) or prolonged exposures (star trails) degrade the image.

I found that for happy snaps of the milky way core an ultra wide angle lens works best. At around 10mm 30sec exposure isnīt a problem.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Milky-Way-LMC-SMC (Large).jpg)
46.9 KB47 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement