#21  
Old 02-07-2005, 11:05 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by cristian abarca
John I have a Sirius optics nebulae 1 filter and it works pretty well on my little scope.

Regards Cristian
Hi Cristian,

One quick word of warning regarding the Sirius Optics filters. These filters are surface coated with the material on the eye lens side of the glass, which makes them very easily damaged. Sirius optics recommends leaving the filter permanently attached to an eyepiece to avoid the possibility of damage, or at least they did with the 2 I bought about 5 years ago. Optically the Sirius optics filters are pretty reasonable. The more expensive filters like Astronomiks and Lumicon are "sandwich filters" with the filter material sandwiched between 2 layers of glass, these filters are extremely durable. The Astronomiks has a 5 year guarantee.

To John,

If your can't afford the Astronomiks or Lumicon the Baader filters do a pretty good job, remember of course you usually get what you pay for in life.

Another option is the DGM Optics NPB filter, I have a friend in the US that I greatly respect who rates this the best narrowband filter he has used and he just recently tested 25 of them for a magazine review.

http://users.erols.com/dgmoptics/

This filter would only cost you about $100 by the time you import it from USA. I haven't used one myself. Of the multitudes I have tried I rate the Astronomics UHC and OIII very highly.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-07-2005, 01:49 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
I agree with what has been said. Better to get a better filter that will last and give you great views that to spend less and get one that is not as good. Astronomics seems to have a good following followed closely by Lumicon and Orion (which incidentally just released their own version of an OIII filter). Regarding Sirius Optics filters, most reviews I have read have noted their delicate nature. Most owners leave them screwed onto the ep to avoid damaging the coatings.

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:26 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Thanks for the input guys. The astronomiks or lumicon UHC sound like the obvious choice really. Unfortunately the bank balance say's NOOO! at this stage.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-07-2005, 12:12 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Have you tried Astromart John? You can save a few bucks off when you get them used

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-07-2005, 02:32 PM
p medcraft's Avatar
p medcraft
CGE 1400

p medcraft is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 69
Re Astromart

I agree with Darren, give Astromart a go. I picked up a 2" OIII for $125.00 USD. WhichI got within a week or so of paying. That is way less than a 1.25" would cost.
Here is an advert off Astromart today, most sold unfortunately but it gives you an idea on price.
ORION Sky Glow - good broadband LPR for price 1.25" $40 (( SOLD 2" $55))
ORION UHC - great filter, just as good as Lumicon. 1.25" $55](( SOLD 2" $75 ))
Lumicon OIII - also great filter. (( SOLD 1.25" $70)) (( SOLD 2" $150 ))
Lumicon H-beta - for faint nebs. (( SOLD 1.25" $75 ))
ORION Minus violet - Takes out purple edges for refractors (( SOLD 1.25" $35 ))
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 05-07-2005, 05:36 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
I think I'll just wait till I get some "excess" money.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 06-07-2005, 01:26 PM
tornado33
Registered User

tornado33 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 4,116
Hi all
I use Lumicon filters, I find the deep sky makes a slight improvement visually, but far more improvement photographically (See my posts in deep sky photography section). The UHC greatly improves detain in emission nebulae like the Lagoon Nebula, and dust lanes in Eta carina are jet black. The Oxygen 3 works better on Planatary nebulae like the large but faint Helix. Just today my Baader UHCS filter arrived, I will let you know what it's like when I use it soon
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:17 PM
dhumpie
Planetary neb & glob nut

dhumpie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 879
Do give us a comparison report between the Lumicon UHC and the Baader UHCS filter. that would be an interesting shootout

Darren
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 06-07-2005, 03:33 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Yes, I'm on the verge of getting the baader....just waiting for you to compare the two!!.....I have no doubt the Lumicon will win out, optical quality wise.....But given the difference in price between the two....It could very well turn out the baader is a better buy....Should be interesting!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-07-2005, 07:07 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hey tornado33....Saw your 'baader UHC filter rock's' thread.... When you get a chance mate...a VISUAL comparison is needed. Thanks.

Last edited by asimov; 07-07-2005 at 07:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 27-07-2005, 07:39 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi guys.

I have just placed an order (yesterday) with DGM Optics for 3 of their highly rated NPB filters. They're on sale at the moment.

I got 2 x 2" filters (1 for John B (ausastronomer) and 1 for h0ughy), and a 1.25" filter for myself. We got a flat rate US$10 shipped (combined postage of all 3 filters).

My 1.25" filter only costs < AU$80 shipped to australia, a bargain price compared to $190 for the Astronomik UHC/OIII, and if the reviews are right, this filter will outperform those high priced filters.

Sorry to xstream, couldn't get your filter included as it would be pushing it close to the $500 customs duty limit.

If anyone else is interested in getting these filters, I recommend you band together with others living close to you and do the same thing (combine postage) to save cost. They're a bargain right now. Dan seems a very nice guy and easy to deal with too, so I doubt you'll go wrong.

Of course the proof is in the first light test, and we'll be sure to test them out when they arrive and let you know how they perform compared to John and Rod's other OIII/UHC filters.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 27-07-2005, 09:53 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
also, try scopetronics on ebay. they sell the orion range fairly cheap. I bought a skyglow from them and the service was pretty fast from the US. they have the ultrablock too
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 22-09-2005, 11:17 PM
chunkylad's Avatar
chunkylad (David)
Open up. it's me, Dave...

chunkylad is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Townsville, Qld
Posts: 282
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman
Hi guys.

I have just placed an order (yesterday) with DGM Optics for 3 of their highly rated NPB filters. They're on sale at the moment.

I got 2 x 2" filters (1 for John B (ausastronomer) and 1 for h0ughy), and a 1.25" filter for myself. We got a flat rate US$10 shipped (combined postage of all 3 filters).

My 1.25" filter only costs < AU$80 shipped to australia, a bargain price compared to $190 for the Astronomik UHC/OIII, and if the reviews are right, this filter will outperform those high priced filters.


Of course the proof is in the first light test, and we'll be sure to test them out when they arrive and let you know how they perform compared to John and Rod's other OIII/UHC filters.


Hey Iceman. Any update on the performance of the DGM Optics NBP filters?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 22-09-2005, 11:34 PM
janoskiss's Avatar
janoskiss (Steve H)
Registered User

janoskiss is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sale, VIC
Posts: 6,033
Nope. I had mine for over a week but haven't had a chance to use it. Good idea bundling orders, Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 23-09-2005, 05:48 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I'm going dark sky this weekend so will do some more tests vs John's filters.
Just haven't had the chance to use it yet, sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 23-09-2005, 08:31 AM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Dave,

As Mike mentioned hopefully we will get to compare them this weekend as we were busy doing the eyepiece testing last time we got together.

Last itme together we looked (or at least Louie and I did, not sure if Mike took a peek) at 1 target only that night through 3 different Narrowband filters. They were the Astronomiks UHC, the Celestron UHC and Mikes 1.25" DGM NPB and the target was M20 the Triffid nebula. I felt the Astronomiks was slightly better and only slightly, on that 1 target than the other 2 which I felt were about equal, there wasn't a lot in it all round. Unfortunately we really need to test on a number of different targets to form any sort of worthwhile opinion as 1 target only doesn't mean anything. What I can say is that seeing the effect of the DGM NPB filter on M20 I certainly think its going to represent excellent value for money as its 1/3rd the price of the Astronomiks.

If your working to a budget I would get my order happening for the DGM NPB, if money isn't an issue you might want to wait to see if it is worth spending the extra money on the Astronomiks. If I can get Scott (Tornado) and Andrew (Hector) to our next new moon session, I would also like to include Scott's Baader UHC filter, Andrews Lumicon UHC and my Astronomiks OIII in the comparison as well, if they will loan them to me.

CS-John B
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 23-09-2005, 01:23 PM
chunkylad's Avatar
chunkylad (David)
Open up. it's me, Dave...

chunkylad is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Townsville, Qld
Posts: 282
Thanks guys

I ordered a NBP filter from DGM this morning. It seems to represent good value for money, especially if it performs as well as it's supposed to.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 23-09-2005, 07:14 PM
acropolite's Avatar
acropolite (Phil)
Registered User

acropolite is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 9,021
I've got one (1.25 inch) on order too, the postage to Tas was only $12.50 making the total US $67.50.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 23-09-2005, 08:51 PM
davidpretorius's Avatar
davidpretorius
lots of eyes on you!

davidpretorius is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Launceston Tasmania
Posts: 7,381
top stuff phil, just in time for next friday and an imaging session with my toucam!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement