Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 17 votes, 5.00 average.
  #501  
Old 07-06-2016, 06:59 PM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
This is a pretty ancient thread David, previous last post was Jan 2015. All the same I'm running a WS same as the original poster and quite impressed with it.
https://www.wunderground.com/persona...ID=IAUCKLAN451
Reply With Quote
  #502  
Old 11-02-2017, 05:05 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Adding to this ancient thread my interest has gone 180 degrees (angle not temperature) from astro imaging to recording the weather.

I use a WS-1081 system but wasn't terribly satisfied with the external temperature readings which recorded higher than normal temperatures.
My local temperatures seemed to be consistently around 2C higher than the BOM stations in my region during the day.

The radiation shield was the culprit.
The shield is designed to operate under optimum conditions namely cloudy and breezy conditions which maximizes the airflow around the sensor.
While the radiation shield is an off white colour that reflects light in the visible spectrum it still absorbs in the infra red region and heats up.

I decided to design a fan aspirated shield using a plastic container, a plumbing elbow joint and a 40mm fan removed from my obsolete ST-7E CCD camera.
The shield was wrapped in a foil insulation tape that reflects both visible and infra red.

Initial tests were quite promising as comparison temperature testing on two weather stations on my property revealed the redesigned shield gave temperatures that were around 1.0 degrees cooler under sunny conditions.
Unfortunately the ST-7E fan was not a sterling performer and had a flow rate of around 5 cfm.
I ordered a fan with a flow rate of around 12 cfm which provided around a 2C differential over the standard radiation shield as well overcoming thermal inertia faster due to wind changes and rapid variations to solar radiation under partly cloudy conditions.

The fan is powered by an old car battery which is trickle charged with a solar panel.
I'm now fairly satisfied I am getting reasonably accurate readings.

Regards

Steven
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (weather.jpg)
147.7 KB36 views
Reply With Quote
  #503  
Old 12-02-2017, 09:48 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Steven,

I suspected the same thing last summer and tried a similar test.
I made a small, prototype Stevenson screen and it lowered the temp
readings and made them more comparable to nearby stations.

As this was a prototype it didn't 'weather' very well, pardon the pun,
but it still proved the point.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (20170212_090953.jpg)
52.3 KB30 views
Reply With Quote
  #504  
Old 12-02-2017, 12:40 PM
sjastro's Avatar
sjastro
Registered User

sjastro is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,926
Hi Steve,

Stevenson screens are the way to go given their use in BOM weather stations.
I've noticed how BOM temperature readings rapidly change with time which reflects the superior air flow characteristics.

Your screen may not have weathered well but I'm sure it was a damn side less expensive than purchasing one.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/like/3321...pid=107&chn=ps

What a rip off for a plastic box with slits in it.

Steven
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 11:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement