Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 24-02-2005, 03:25 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
New Toucam 2 Pro

I decided after seeing all the posts relating to imaging that it was time to bite the bullet and get one of these cameras. Maybe I might have been a little premature as I already have an Ibot firewire webcam and my laptop has firewire built in to it. For those who dont know what a Ibot webcam looks like, I think the best description is a bit like an eye on steroids. So people, I am going to need some assistance in getting this imaging thing going, obviously as RumplesR lives closest to me, I might see what he can do once his back is on the improve. Paul I can sympathise with you on this, I did something major to my back doing "weights" when I was young and stupid, and ended up in traction..that was fun I can tell you. It still goes "ape" every so often. Word to the wise, look after your backs!!
Any assistance much appreciated people.
BTW I picked the Toucam up from Matthew Lovel at Astronomy.com (he is the guy that pointed me to this forum). He says that there is an upgrade (hardware) that he does to the Toucam to enable it to take DSO long time exposures. New to me with the toucam, but I reckon the knowledgable people here already know of it.
PS. Matthew mentioned he also adds an IR filter to the Toucam, it just screws into the "eyepiece" adapter.
Any comment on this as well guys??
I suppose this post should have been in the photography area, sorry about that..


Last edited by Exfso; 24-02-2005 at 03:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24-02-2005, 03:39 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Is this the newer version of the toucam......if not does anyone know if or when the newer one is coming out.....I know gary was talking about it last month......has anyone got an update.

Good luck with your new toucam "Old Fart"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24-02-2005, 03:44 PM
[1ponders]'s Avatar
[1ponders] (Paul)
Retired, damn no pension

[1ponders] is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Obi Obi, Qld
Posts: 18,778
There is a well regarded hardware rewiring process, I can dig it up if you want it. It does require you to semi-pull apart your ToUcam and disconnect a few wires and join them to a few others and then resolder them somewhere else As you can tell by this description I don't do that stuff. However I understand that anyone moderately capable with electronics can do the modifications.

I have an IR filter that I bought when I first got my ToUcam but have never used it as its blue in colour.

I'm looking forward to some ToUcam images through that lovely scope of yours. that should really set the bar
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24-02-2005, 04:40 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The IR filters are specifically built by Matthew in conjunction with a guy from ASSA, so that they are exactly the right wavelength for the toucam apparently. Matthew can explain in more detail if you want to email him.

Cheers

Peter
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-02-2005, 10:03 PM
rumples riot
Who knows

rumples riot is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Blackwood South Australia
Posts: 3,051
Peter, I will be more than happy to show you all I know not this weekend, but the following ( I will ring and set up a time). The back is on the improve already.

As for the filter, I bought the $60 one and used it once. Now I don't use it at all.

Still if you get the really good one, that is supposed to be really good for picking up fine detail.

See you in a couple of weeks mate.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25-02-2005, 08:47 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi peter.

The ibot firewire may have done the job, as long as you can remove the lens and attach an adapter.

However since you've bought the ToUcam, you may as well use it and play around with it. When you gain experience, then you can give the other webcam a try - though if you want a webcam for actual use in or around your computer, then you won't want to fiddle with it taking the lens out.

The long-exposure mod is useful is you want to start taking deep-space shots, obviously you need an accurate tracking mount for this. Seeker has a similarly modified ToUcam (the Atik version) and takes some great shots with his ETX. If you just want to start on the planets and the moon (much less time consuming and difficult to get right), then don't worry about the long-exposure mod for now.

As for the IR filter, you don't necessarily *need* one, but apparently the images come out better with one. I've yet to see a definitive with/without comparison taken on the same night, same settings, same conditions, but i'm going to perform that test in the very near future.

The $60 IR filter is blue, I bought it, and didn't like it. All your images will come out blue. I replaced it with the $120 edmund scientific one, which is neutral colour and the images come out in the natural colour.

As for settings during capture etc, Paul will be able to help you, and it'll be much easier to show you in person. He can even help to show you how to process your images after, because the capture is only worth about 40% of the final image.

Can't wait to see the results taken through your tak!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25-02-2005, 09:28 AM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah I am really getting interested in this now. I was looking at Saturn last night through the Tak, and it was beautiful even at 500x, the seeing was as good as it has been for ages. Got 6 stars in the trapezium clearly as well, so this scope when seeing permits is a "beauty", mind you it would want to be for the price.

Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25-02-2005, 07:11 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Only 6, ie; A, B, C, D, e & f. What about g and h ??
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25-02-2005, 07:47 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Damn, that is how much I know, didnt know there was more..oh well back to square one..lol

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25-02-2005, 08:20 PM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Sorry Peter, e = 11.1, f = 11.5, g = 16.7 and h = 15.8 mags.
Don't know if your TAK would go down to 17 th mag. (g & h are veeerrryyy faint). Just joshin'.
ps. might be worth a try tho! Good conditions etc, good dark site. What say guys? Bit too faint?

Last edited by RAJAH235; 25-02-2005 at 08:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25-02-2005, 10:06 PM
Exfso
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No probs Rajah, I believe the Tak is good to about mag14. so I cant really complain. In any case it is a bloody beautiful piece of technology. I figured when I got it, I have one chance at a great scope, got the approval of the "boss", so go for it. I am pushing 60, so I reckon I deserve a go at something great before i cash my cheque. Seriously the build of these pieces of engineering is something to behold. My biggest problem is I dont have the experience that a lot of the guys here have, but, believe me, I might be an old fart, but I love learning. BTW, the people on this forum are great, it is so nice to have something local. IE in the Australian region. We have magnificent and by enlarge untainted skies here, so it is really great to be associated with a forum that exemplifies this..holy hell, big words, but I think you know what I am trying to get across.

cheers.

Peter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement