Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-03-2012, 06:30 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Tick Tock, Tick Tock

Just waiting for the arrival of my new QSI683WSG-8 camera to arrive tomorrow. It left Sydney yesterday from Bintel, on overnight road transport. I suspect it will not arrive until Monday given Australian postal services but I might be pleasantly surprised.

Why did I buy a new QSI when I already have a good one in the 583WSG? Well there are a number of reasons.
  1. First and foremost my DSO imaging aspirations include doing images with L R G B Ha SII OII as full combinations. It was going to be too hard to do that with the current camera.
  2. Faster downloads.
  3. An increase in cooling capacity. My only gripe with the 583 is that cooling on warm nights (26 degrees C or thereabouts) meant that I had to increase the temperature to be held and that does not always suit me. Don't get me wrong the cooling is good 99% of the time, it is those rare nights that I want more cooling power.
In preparation I have picked up the refractor today and all the filters ready for the new camera. I will post images once it arrives.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-03-2012, 07:35 PM
cventer's Avatar
cventer
Registered User

cventer is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 957
Lucky bugger. I cancelled my order for a QSi683 after wating 3 monts with no end in sight with the promise of an SBIG STF before Xmas last year. Its now end of March no no STF-83000


Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
Just waiting for the arrival of my new QSI683WSG-8 camera to arrive tomorrow. It left Sydney yesterday from Bintel, on overnight road transport. I suspect it will not arrive until Monday given Australian postal services but I might be pleasantly surprised.

Why did I buy a new QSI when I already have a good one in the 583WSG? Well there are a number of reasons.
  1. First and foremost my DSO imaging aspirations include doing images with L R G B Ha SII OII as full combinations. It was going to be too hard to do that with the current camera.
  2. Faster downloads.
  3. An increase in cooling capacity. My only gripe with the 583 is that cooling on warm nights (26 degrees C or thereabouts) meant that I had to increase the temperature to be held and that does not always suit me. Don't get me wrong the cooling is good 99% of the time, it is those rare nights that I want more cooling power.
In preparation I have picked up the refractor today and all the filters ready for the new camera. I will post images once it arrives.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-03-2012, 08:36 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
I've been wrestling with the idea of upgrading my 583ws for the same one as you're waiting for. Same reasons as you. I can upgrade mine for the 8 filter wheel etc, but for the cost I might as well just go the whole hog and trade in the 583.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-03-2012, 08:51 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Does your better half know of your plans, Troy?
I was tempted to upgrade as well but decided that in the long run it was too expensive and to be honest I'll take the few minutes to change the wheel if I want to do the whole shebang of LRGB and NB on an object.
I still love the feel of the camera and it's engineering when I use it. It's a jewel in aluminium.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-03-2012, 09:20 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
No, she doesn't. And if you keep quiet, she won't.
Yeah, I'm leaning away from it now. Always in the back of my mind, but would need to be doing a lot more imaging to justify it.

Sorry for the OT, Paul. Jealous.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-03-2012, 09:27 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Chris I made my order just after new year and at that time it was supposed to be 6-8 weeks. One of QSI's component makers up and cancelled an order and that put a spanner in the works. It took them some time to come up with an alternative supplier and then test the part of consistency (This is basically the story I was told). In any event all is good. Shame about the SBIG.

Troy and Allan, yes I had to think about this long and hard before ordering. This system works so well as it is with the 583 and as you say Allan the Jewel in aluminum. As yet I am undecided as to whether I want to sell the 583 or just use it with a SLR lens and the WS face to do wide field.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-03-2012, 09:56 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Just get an adapter and use some of Virgs lenses with it.
I envy your choice of the 683 as the better cooling and time for downloads will be a great advantage and I think if you manage to couple this with the 12" GSO RC it really will be a killing machine for photons.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-03-2012, 11:06 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
What refractor did you pick up Paul?

QSI 683 sounds like a wonderful camera.

It sounds like a FLI Microline with a built in guider and filter wheel. Very neat.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-03-2012, 12:28 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by allan gould View Post
Just get an adapter and use some of Virgs lenses with it.
I envy your choice of the 683 as the better cooling and time for downloads will be a great advantage and I think if you manage to couple this with the 12" GSO RC it really will be a killing machine for photons.

Don't worry I won't be using any Canon lenses on my gear. Like Tony I have a fairly good collection of lenses now (Nikkors all the way). No self respecting Nikon dude will have Canon lenses an his gear. Well maybe his freak 400.

The 12" will have my STL11K working with that. If I ever find time to get some images done with that. .

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
What refractor did you pick up Paul?

QSI 683 sounds like a wonderful camera.

It sounds like a FLI Microline with a built in guider and filter wheel. Very neat.

Greg.
My TSA 102 Greg; I went down to the observatory and picked up my little battle tank. I think you might have thought I bought another one. Can't afford to do that yet. LOL.

The 683 is really a supped up 583. The design of these cameras is just pure elegance. When you open these things up to install the filters you see how really thoughful the design is in reality. Great cameras.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 23-03-2012, 07:53 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
They sound great.

When I've fiddled with adapters and spacers and so forth I have started to think - maybe I should get a QSI 6 series. The FLI Microline seemed a lot more advanced in performance than the 5 series but not so sure there is too much of a gap if any in the 6 series. Then the combined convenienve of built in filter wheel and offaxis guider puts the QSI in front.

FLI's traditional strengths have been powerful cooling, super fast downloads (1 second full frame), super low noise, option of no cover slip,
argon filled hermetically sealed CCD chamber, guarantee of sensor orthogonality, compact and light but rugged, quality shutter and CCD window. FLI filter wheels are so so. Perhaps the new Centreline model has raised the bar otherwise FLI filterwheels are overpriced. The main issue with FLI is they disregard autoguiding solutions completely.

Now I've been doing astrophotography for around 6 years now it becomes clear that if you can get round focused stars eveything else kind of takes care of itself. You are more than halfway there. So to disregard that aspect is crazy, its at least half the problem of imaging.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 23-03-2012, 09:34 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
The only things in the your list Greg that were missing from the 5 series was the super cooling and fast download speed everything else QSI had been doing. Not to mention QSI moved into this market from scientific imaging, which they had been doing for nearly 30 years. The QSI cameras are small for a reason; that being so it fits on a microscope. It had nothing to do with astronomy and that was just a happy by-product. The electronics produce quality results because scientific imaging requires that standard. Again just another happy by-product.

I have quizzed Kevin from QSI several times about their products and where they have come from. Each time I was met with professional and informative information. The company has an interesting background and is keen to corner a niche within this market. The way the camera is put together and its design is what made me buy the 6 series.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 23-03-2012, 10:49 AM
cfranks (Charles)
Registered User

cfranks is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Tungkillo, South Australia
Posts: 599
I've had a QSI 540wsg for a while now and I agree with Paul about the need for additional cooling. I had a water cooled heat exchanger mounted on the camera but it wasn't all that effective in Adelaide's Summer temps. My QSI 683wsg-8 arrived a few months back and I have never had a problem reaching my set temp of -20C. I think I successfully tried -30 once! One thing I have found is that the KAF-8300 chip in the 683 (and 583), is so much more sensitive than the KAI-04022 in the 540. I virtually never saw cosmic ray strikes before but now get multiples per frame. No problems and easy to get rid of but interesting! I get a bit of vignetting as I only have mounted 1.25" filters. Unmounted 31mm would have been a better option but Flat Fielding fixes the vignetting at least for my satisfaction.
Charles
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 23-03-2012, 01:39 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Times UP.

It arrived this morning. Images below show me and my new baby.

Got it doing 20 minute darks right now in 20C room temp at -25C 81% power. Noiice. Darks look even and consistent with a few cosmic ray strikes here and there.


As always impressive looking piece of engineering. I have all the filters mounted now and ready for action. I am going to try the focusing disk for the OAG instead of the spacer. We'll see how that goes.

Double boxing on the shipping is excellent when combined with the pelican case.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_0289.jpg)
183.0 KB54 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_0294.jpg)
85.6 KB48 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_0296.jpg)
115.5 KB55 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_0297.jpg)
182.1 KB62 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_0298.jpg)
78.5 KB74 views
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 23-03-2012, 01:43 PM
Peter.M's Avatar
Peter.M
Registered User

Peter.M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 970
Is that some drool I see on your t-shirt and pants? Dont worry, this camera would make me do the same!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 23-03-2012, 01:54 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter.M View Post
Is that some drool I see on your t-shirt and pants? Dont worry, this camera would make me do the same!
Yeah most likely.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 23-03-2012, 02:28 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,680
Nice looking unit...who's the aging surfy

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 23-03-2012, 02:29 PM
dugnsuz's Avatar
dugnsuz (Doug)
Registered User

dugnsuz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
Very nice Paul.
Your project idea sounds exciting.
BTW, that first pic is very Sidonio-esque!!
Cheers
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 23-03-2012, 03:58 PM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike View Post
Nice looking unit...who's the aging surfy

Mike
Some old grungy dude.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dugnsuz View Post
Very nice Paul.
Your project idea sounds exciting.
BTW, that first pic is very Sidonio-esque!!
Cheers
Doug
Yeah looking forward to doing the multi bandwidth imaging.

Yes that first image does have that madness look.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 23-03-2012, 05:16 PM
troypiggo's Avatar
troypiggo (Troy)
Bust Duster

troypiggo is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 4,846
Filter wheel looks huuuuuuge.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 23-03-2012, 06:18 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Onya Paul......enjoy to the max.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement