Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 16-03-2012, 05:35 PM
Varangian's Avatar
Varangian (John)
Registered User

Varangian is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 599
Can we build a bigger Hubble?

This has probably been discussed a billion times??? but I am interested in hearing peoples response. Funding aside, is it possible to build a massive Hubble? I think Hubble is 2.4 metres? Could we build a 5-6 metre (or larger) monster in order to have a good look at extra-solar planetary systems and other DSOs? Are there limitations to what we can do? How large could/would we need to go and what do you think we could see?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16-03-2012, 05:42 PM
TrevorW
Registered User

TrevorW is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 8,277
John read this

http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16-03-2012, 07:08 PM
wasyoungonce's Avatar
wasyoungonce (Brendan)
Certified Village Idiot

wasyoungonce is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mexico city (Melb), Australia
Posts: 2,359
Bigger Hubble ......not needed these days...well not quite right there is the James WEB telescope...working in differing wavelengths that we cannot receive on earth.

Adaptive optics telescopes have become the new grail...where a sodium LASER is fired into the upper atmosphere and this is used as a reference collimation star and adaptive optics correct a 2ndry deformable mirror for atmospheric conditions.

This has made major improvements these days and giving outstanding imaging .....although ground based does have it's own drawbacks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16-03-2012, 07:21 PM
Keltik's Avatar
Keltik (Trevor)
Canis Major, Canis Minor

Keltik is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 98
One of my occasional astro-related daydreams has been the deployment of a large space telescope with a companion satellite that can be maneouvered in the scope's line of sight to produce a tiny occultation circle. This setup could then be positioned to occult the intense light from a star and possibly reveal more detail of its planetary systems. But perhaps there's some basic element of optics I am unaware of that makes the idea lame. So I'll shut up now.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16-03-2012, 09:33 PM
Varangian's Avatar
Varangian (John)
Registered User

Varangian is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrevorW View Post
Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 17-03-2012, 12:46 AM
blindman's Avatar
blindman
Now I see !!!

blindman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Where chemtrails are presented as...
Posts: 532
Wow, amazing.
And "science" still wondering in the dark, not much further than 2000 years ago.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement