Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-04-2011, 08:19 PM
A23649's Avatar
A23649 (Nathan)
I've told you once.

A23649 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 133
exposure times?

hey every one,
as i am getting a new scope setup soon i would like to know from some of the more experienced astrophotographers what are the best exposure times, ISO settings and the like for a canon 1000d and some of the easy and bright objects( not the orion nebula, as it seems impossible for a beginner). the new scope is a 8" f/4 newtonian reflector.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 13-04-2011, 02:18 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Hi Nathan

The longest you can

In general, I used to use around 5 minutes, but it depends if you're guiding.

If you're not guiding, your exposures will be as long as you can before you start getting trails or elongated stars. That might only be 30 seconds.

Use ISO800 or 1600 to start with.

Hope that helps!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 13-04-2011, 04:37 PM
arifmshaikh
Registered User

arifmshaikh is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 142
I use GSO 8" f/4 and took the first image of orion, Eta Carina and Omega Centauri with ISO 1600 using canon 400d.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 13-04-2011, 05:33 PM
tlgerdes's Avatar
tlgerdes (Trevor)
Love the moonless nights!

tlgerdes is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney
Posts: 2,285
I was using the same setup. I was generally shooting 5min @ 800iso with good results for most objects, some things were less ie 2-4mins ie ETA C, Omega Cent, some things more 7-10mins ie HH.

All though at 800iso
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 13-04-2011, 05:42 PM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
Until I get more experience, I also primarily use 1600 ISO. Guiding restrict me to max 2 minutes.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 13-04-2011, 08:38 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Nathan,

It depends on how bright your local skies are, or, from wherever you may be imaging from.

On your 1000D, try and obtain a histogram (at whatever ISO you may be using) that peaks somewhere along 1/3rd of the way across the X-axis. This will be a matter of trial and error.

The same principle (peak histogram) also applies to your flat light frames that you take. But, they should be taken at ISO-100, or whatever the lowest native ISO of your system may be.

H
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14-04-2011, 08:00 AM
A23649's Avatar
A23649 (Nathan)
I've told you once.

A23649 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 133
thanks a lot there h, seems vey helpful
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement