Hi Stu & All,
A very impressive observational feat -- well done to the team.

Extremely interesting.
Very interesting star exhibiting peculiar spectra that is probably related to its youth (about 40 million years old). The system (of planets) surrounding bears some similarity to our own solar-system (in orbital resonances etc), though the masses of the planets are quite large compared to our system (all four are estimated to be 5-10 Jupiter masses) and they are much further out.
Will be interesting to see if any terrestrial-sized objects can be detected in the coming years. They will be difficult to detect given the system is essentially face on and there will be no transit events to detect. Given the mass of the star (~1.5 solar masses) it will probably settle finally onto the main sequence at about F4-5 with a surface temp about 7450 deg K -- somewhat like neighbouring Procyon (Alpha Canis Minoris) and be about 5x more luminous than our own Sun.
This will result in a total main sequence life-time of 2.73 billion years and it would be a full-blown red-giant at about 3.1 billion years.
If there were (in the future) a terrestrial planet of sufficient mass and type etc etc somewhere near the habitable zone and life did get started there, it would need to develop much, much faster than it did here to even get to the point of being multi-cellular life before the habitable zone moves outward (and away) enough to doom it. There would be no way known that life of any type would be
presently be on such a terrestrial planet that would be much too hot and probably still undergoing accretion.
I'd think that in the future, this star might possibly be a life-host (simple life) if there is a terrestrial planet at the right spot with the right conditions etc etc. Multi-cellular life (pond-scum etc) (assuming everything that could be going for it is going in its favour) is a remote possibility.
I'd posit that the development of advanced life, let alone intelligent life would be an extreme long-shot if not completely hopeless (mainly because of the brevity of the time-frame). Larger stars have more distant but slightly wider habitable zones (than our Sun for example) but they move outward much more quickly as the star evolves (and brightens) more rapidly than the Sun does/will. The maximum time a planet would be in the habitable zone (as that zone creeps outward) would be 1-1.5-odd billion years. By comparison, it took 700 million years minimum for single-celled creatures to appear on Earth (from the fossil record) and a further 3 billion years after than for single-celled creatures here to become multi-cellular, then another 400-odd million years before there were advanced plants and animal life.
Best,
Les D