Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-08-2009, 04:25 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Scutum Star Cloud with Wild Duck

Took advantage of a clear night in Melbourne.

Canon 5DH. Canon 300mm F2.8L at f/5. All at 400 ISO fridge at -10.0 C.

10x( 2, 4 & 8 min) exposures. Usual HDR method.

Full res image here 10.6MB
http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co...mstarcloud.jpg

There is a small PN visible at bottom right.

Bert
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (scutumstarcloudsm.jpg)
145.1 KB40 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-08-2009, 04:31 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Very nicely done Bert. Star shapes are great and well resolved. One of your best I reckon. Even the little blue/green planetary has details on the edge and I also like the globular resolution and colours at the bottom middle left.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-08-2009, 04:34 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Talking

I like my Scutum Cloud sauteed and then draped over a roasted wild duck with spring vegetables
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-08-2009, 05:47 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Lovely subtle colours.
Great image.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-08-2009, 05:58 PM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Yes Marc I am guiding the 300mm optic with a 1250mm MAK. So the image resolution is only limited by the optic and sensor. Dithering enhances sensor resolution. The Canon 300mm F2.8L lens is a superb bit of optic. It has better resolution than than the canon 5DH sensor.

The original tiffs were upsized from 73MB to 146MB before median stacking. This makes all the difference. The original tiff that this image is derived from is 135MB. The original Tiff is far better than what you are seeing now a crappy jpg!

The other trick is to correct for flats and darks in uncompressed fits. Stretch the fits and then only convert to 16 bit tiffs for stacking in Registar. I always use the noise option in Registar as it can be quite good at superimposing artefacts. I then go back with the median stacked file and stack again so noise is even further eliminated.

Bert
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement