Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-04-2005, 05:23 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Graphite, Fibre Glass or PVC

Hi all,

I am thinking in the future to upgrade my Steel tube to a lighter material, anyone know who manufactures these sorts of tubes mine will need to be 254mm dia and 1530mm in length.

All part of the big plan to improve my scope. Before I move upto a 12" for the observatory.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2005, 05:49 PM
ausastronomer (John Bambury)
Registered User

ausastronomer is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Shoalhaven Heads, NSW
Posts: 2,620
Andrew,

If you don't want the existing steel tube for anything and just wish to build an identical lighter replacement tube. I would do the following:-

I would use the existing steel tube as a template (mould) and build a new carbon fibre tube. You build it in 2 halves then join them together. Carbon Fibre is similar to fibreglassing where you use the Carbon Fibre Matt then the appropriate resin, excepting of course that it costs a lot more but is also much stronger and lighter than fibreglass. Carbon Fibre actually looks really neat if you do a good job because the gold matt shows through the black resin and gives a really nice appearance and you can polish it to a high lustre. If you have done any fibreglassing at all you should be fine.

Another cheaper option than carbon fibre is to use normal fibreglass matting with vinyl resin as opposed to the normal polyester resin. Vinyl resin is a lot stronger than polyester resin so you could make the tube with much thinner walls for the same strength and thus a little lighter than normal fibreglass. Personnally I would be going with Carbon Fibre, I have seen a couple of Carbon Fibre OTA's and they look pretty smick.

CS-John Bambury
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2005, 07:42 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
I think Bird (planetary/lunar astrophotographer) uses an aluminium tube as it reaches thermal equilibrium quicker and reduces tube currents.. at least that's my recollection.

There's some discussion of it in the last page or 2 of the "show us your rig" thread.

It might be overkill for you, but it's another pov.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-04-2005, 01:39 AM
RAJAH235's Avatar
RAJAH235
A very 'Senior' member.

RAJAH235 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: South Coast N.S.W.
Posts: 2,571
Andrew, If you take ALL the bits & pieces, eg, mirrors etc etc, & weighed your steel tube, you would be surprised how light it actually is. Why do you want to change it?
I have added extra lead as counter weights to my t'scope & now the all-up weight,(inc.base,battery,E/Pc. box, etc), is around 40/45 kilos.
It does not move when the wind blows. It has MASS. Solid as a rock.Moves really smoothly, when I want it to. Plus it's a SONOTUBE. ie; cardboard.
If you want a lighter tube. WHY?
L.
Sorry If I've ruffled anyones feathers.
ps. I had been using one of our members t'scopes(10" Bintel) one nite & a puff of wind came up. The t'scope was shaken & vibrated so much that I couldn't see the image.
Just the facts m'am.

Last edited by RAJAH235; 09-04-2005 at 02:15 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-04-2005, 02:37 AM
ballaratdragons's Avatar
ballaratdragons (Ken)
The 'DRAGON MAN'

ballaratdragons is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In the Dark at Snake Valley, Victoria
Posts: 14,412
I have to agree with Laurie on this one. When I had my mirror out to loosen the clamps, I moved the tube out of the way and was suprised by it's light weight! and mine is a 12". GS use very thin steel. The only thing I can think of is because yours is home-made you may have used thicker steel in the tube than necessary.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-04-2005, 07:36 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
The main reason is with mirrors, focuser, finder on the tube weight is 15kg But this includes the dob Alt axis aswell. I just thought a fibreglass or other material tube would lighten the load, so I don't have to lug around so much weight. I am having problems with my Back right now and finding it difficult to carry the load. The material used on the tube is quite a bit thicker that the GS scopes I have seen. It is rolled galvanised steel, not sure of exact thickness.

Maybe I have not thought this through completely, and just giving myself an extra expense that I really don't need now (saving for an eq6 with skyscan)

I appreciate all your comments, it gives me a better understanding of where I should go.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-04-2005, 09:13 AM
slice of heaven
Registered User

slice of heaven is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: S.A.
Posts: 1,079
For a comparison Astroman,
I have a fibreglass 8" OT. It weighs under 10kgs. Thats complete with no finder. It's an F6 though so the tube is 200mm shorter than yours.
Might be an expensive excercise for a couple of kilos.

Slice

Last edited by slice of heaven; 09-04-2005 at 11:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-04-2005, 09:25 AM
Orion's Avatar
Orion
Obsessed

Orion is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Swansea N.S.W.
Posts: 1,107
Here is a link about making fibreglass telescope tubes if your interested.
http://www.atmsite.org/contrib/Kohut/fgtube/page1.html
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:57 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement