Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-02-2016, 01:57 PM
Tristan
Registered User

Tristan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10
Light pollition filter

Living near the city sucks. So I'm wondering what light pollution filter works really well to get decent images through serious light pollution? Cheers.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2016, 06:56 PM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
I've used an Astronomik CLS, means longer exposure times to compensate for the blocked photons but works ok for Sodium and Mercury vapour lighting. May depend if your local lighting is being upgraded to led. Quite different spectrum on those and a lot harder to block.
There are a pile of others but I haven't tested any. Others will chip in with their recommendations.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2016, 07:01 PM
Somnium's Avatar
Somnium (Aidan)
Aidan

Somnium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
Best solution for lp is very narrow band imaging
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2016, 07:09 PM
Tristan
Registered User

Tristan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10
I really want to do narrow band but just can't afford them at this stage. Looking for affordable options so I can actually get usable data to practise without traveling hours away.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2016, 07:21 PM
Somnium's Avatar
Somnium (Aidan)
Aidan

Somnium is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,669
If you have a background glow without a gradient then extra time imaging and lp filters can help, if you have a gradient it is extremely difficult to eliminate
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2016, 09:55 PM
Tristan
Registered User

Tristan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10
how do you tell the difference? what do cities normally cause?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2016, 10:25 PM
bigjoe (JOSEPH)
Registered User

bigjoe is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: sydney
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroID View Post
I've used an Astronomik CLS, means longer exposure times to compensate for the blocked photons but works ok for Sodium and Mercury vapour lighting. May depend if your local lighting is being upgraded to led. Quite different spectrum on those and a lot harder to block.
There are a pile of others but I haven't tested any. Others will chip in with their recommendations.
Brent.

+1 for the Astronomic CLS; best filter I have ever used , and on all types of objects even Jupiter!

bigjoe.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-02-2016, 10:49 PM
DJT (David)
Registered User

DJT is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,459
Astronomik CLS as well. I used it with a DSLR from Sydney Burbs, worked fine though Hutech LPs is one that is highly rated as well. It makes a huge difference. Again, if a helpful council is upgrading your street lights it would have an adverse affect.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-02-2016, 02:51 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,996
astronomik ccd cls for me too. I have heard the hutech is also good. what are you using? DSLR? astro modified or unmodified?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-02-2016, 06:16 PM
Tristan
Registered User

Tristan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10
I'm Using a unmodified canon 1200D so a clip in filter would be great! Just gotta convince the Mrs
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-02-2016, 06:38 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,996
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tristan View Post
I'm Using a unmodified canon 1200D so a clip in filter would be great! Just gotta convince the Mrs

yeah no dramas, you don't need the astronomik ccd cls then just the cls (the ccd cls has an IR/UV cut which is more expensive - but not required for an unmodded dslr).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement