Fat particles

[xelasnave]

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0311349

This is exciting research enjoy the paper.

[AlexN]

Thanks for the link Alex. Just printed a copy and will have a read over my am coffee.

[AlexN]

I fear a little of that paper went above my head.. I do ponder... How does their mate hold up now that the Highs Boson has been found?

[deanm (Dean)]

I've got a science PhD - and I understood about 2% of that!

Never mind, there's a cunning website which will write your paper for you:

http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/

In fact, the 3 of us on this thread have just authored this robust, ready-to-submit paper:

___________________________________ __________________________________

Contrasting Gigabit Switches and the Location-Identity Split Using CoolPinax

Deanm, AlexN and Xelasnave

Abstract

"The hardware and architecture method to Markov models is defined not only by the investigation of RPCs, but also by the compelling need for DHTs [1,2,3,4]. Here, we show the construction of linked lists, which embodies the unfortunate principles of artificial intelligence. Despite the fact that such a hypothesis might seem perverse, it fell in line with our expectations. In order to solve this quagmire, we disconfirm not only that redundancy and reinforcement learning [5] can synchronize to surmount this grand challenge, but that the same is true for operating systems".

http://scigen.csail.mit.edu/scicache...lexN.Deanm.pdf

Got that?!

Dean

[xelasnave]

Who would have thought a background in law would be helpful.
Reading legal judgements seems similar somehow.
I recall one judgement and the text book author concluding...

This case is certainly authority for what it decides...what ever that may be.

I think being able to use simple words is the difficult game.
Still some seem to enjoy demonstrating they own a dictionary.

[xelasnave]

The key to reading scientific papers and judgements is read the first paragraph and the last them read the lot.
Love the linked site Dean

[AlexN]

That what I did Alex. Read the preface then the summary/discussion. Then attempt the rest. I suffer from the same problem as Michael Faraday. I understand the theory, I understand the experiment and the scientific process. I do not understand the math.

[xelasnave]

Math is my shortfall.
I would have got 100 per cent in the trial leaving certificate in science but dropped 1.5 marks for a simple math mistake.
Still topped the exam but so upset not to get full marks.
I would love to be able to do GR equations.