Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 30-09-2008, 11:06 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Loosen your screws or.....CRACK!

If anyone has tightened their screws on the retaining ring of their corrector plate during the colder times of winter...word of advice from someone who has just learned a very expensive lesson.......

LOOSEN THEM OFF BEFORE THE SUMMER HITS!

I took the cover off for tonight's imaging to find this.

Baz.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (IMG_3029.jpg)
60.0 KB129 views
Click for full-size image (IMG_3030.jpg)
61.3 KB108 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-09-2008, 11:11 PM
h0ughy's Avatar
h0ughy (David)
Moderator

h0ughy is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NEWCASTLE NSW Australia
Posts: 33,426
Barry I am truely sorry for your loss, i have never touched the screws on the scopes ihave owned around the corrector plate? how hot did it get in the observatory?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-09-2008, 11:27 PM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Mate, I dont think it got all that extreme. But, when I last took it off and tightened it back down, temperatures here were in the minuses for a couple of months. With the onset of spring, we have been having 20+ days.

Corrector plates are most commonly removed to gain acess to the mirror for cleaning. Anyone who's scope is out of warranty may have done this, as I have. It never even occurred to me to consider metal and glass contraction for the chance of seasons.

My windscreen on my car did the same thing to me a few years ago. A cold morning, turned on the demister and watched a crack go from one side of the car to the other in about 15 seconds....

It doesn't help that correctors are PAIRED with the primary mirror on manufacture. You cant just order a new one in the mail and chuck it in.

Now I know. Doesn't help me, but perhaps this warning can save others.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-09-2008, 11:35 PM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
How are you going explain that the claims assessor when you make your accidential damage claim on the home insurance ?

Looks expensive to repair.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-09-2008, 11:41 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Geez Baz, as another "cat" owner that is a terrible thing to happen to your scope.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:27 AM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,625
I'm so sorry to hear that Barry.

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-10-2008, 06:54 AM
Phil's Avatar
Phil
Phil H

Phil is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cowra NSW
Posts: 1,497
That sucks Baz. Sorry to see that mate.
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:47 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
That's ok folks. I'm a bit upset, as I have grown quite attatched to this scope, but I will live I'm sure. Thanks for your condolences.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Robinson View Post
How are you going explain that the claims assessor when you make your accidential damage claim on the home insurance ?

Looks expensive to repair.
Ian, I am not sure if an AD claim would be legit but I am going to ask if it can be done. If not, it will have to be a personal loan I think. I think it is at the point where there is no point repairing. It will never be the same or up to standard again. It's time to replace.

Baz.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-10-2008, 07:49 AM
peter brown
Registered User

peter brown is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: mount beauty, australia
Posts: 83
My sceptic wife just said..."sounds like a very good excuse to buy a new telescope!! "
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:21 AM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
Sorry to hear about it Barry.

One thing that has always struck me, is the relative difference in quality between the Celestron and Meade SCT's I've had. Whereas the Meades use a very good quality metal corrector plate flange that distributes the tension of these bolts out along the flange very evenly over the corrector plate itself, the Celestrons use a flimsy crappy plastic flange - well, in the C8 anyhow. The tension under the bolt heads is very localised as the plasticdoesn't have the shear strength to distribute the load. What's the C11's made of? Looks like plastic to me? Maybe there's an aftermarket need for a better system?

Fuuny, huh. I've always thought of my Celestron's better optics (marginal, but nontheless true) but Meade's better tube quality.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:23 AM
matt's Avatar
matt
6000 post club member

matt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Launceston, Australia
Posts: 6,570
My C9.25 corrector 'flange' is metal.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:32 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
That`s terrible Baz,
have you checked to see if it still performs ok even with the crack?
Maybe you could get it repaired like a crack in a windscreen if the crack hasn`t distorted the corrector too much?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:39 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaroo View Post
Sorry to hear about it Barry.

One thing that has always struck me, is the relative difference in quality between the Celestron and Meade SCT's I've had. Whereas the Meades use a very good quality metal corrector plate flange that distributes the tension of these bolts out along the flange very evenly over the corrector plate itself, the Celestrons use a flimsy crappy plastic flange - well, in the C8 anyhow. The tension under the bolt heads is very localised as the plasticdoesn't have the shear strength to distribute the load. What's the C11's made of? Looks like plastic to me? Maybe there's an aftermarket need for a better system?

Fuuny, huh. I've always thought of my Celestron's better optics (marginal, but nontheless true) but Meade's better tube quality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garyh View Post
That`s terrible Baz,
have you checked to see if it still performs ok even with the crack?
Maybe you could get it repaired like a crack in a windscreen if the crack hasn`t distorted the corrector too much?
Its a metal flange, but yes, it could be more solid to distribute the tension more evenly.

I havent looked through it yet, but the primary use of this scope is imaging. I have done extensive mods to this baby to squeeze as much as I can out of it. This cracked corrector is one giant optical leap backwards. Better to get a new one.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:45 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Not good Baz.

If the scope is buggered and you cannot get a replacement corrector, then what Gary suggested with the windscreen fix type crack removal, is worth a try. If you don't try you will never know.

All the best.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-10-2008, 10:55 AM
Satchmo's Avatar
Satchmo
Registered User

Satchmo is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,883
Sorry to hear that Barry . You'll probably need to buy a whole new tube assembly. Meade don't individually figure their SCT optics to match each other. They use a mix and match process finding out which mass batch machine polished parts will work best with what. BY the time you send your whole tube back to match a corrector and wait X months, hence you'll probably find it simpler to buy a new tube.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:08 AM
bloodhound31
Registered User

bloodhound31 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,628
Heres a rough idea how a corrector plate is made (I think)

and how the image distorts when it cracks.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (untitled.GIF)
13.3 KB48 views
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:29 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
I would presume you would get bright flaring off of most stars, if not all stars.

I had a split many years ago in the prism of a off-axis guider that gave flaring off of the stars. I elliminated the faring by putting a black mask over the cracked area.

If you want the best, and no doubt you do, after seeing the work you have put into peltier cooling your scope; then get a new one. If finances are an issue, I would be trying these other things first.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-10-2008, 11:30 AM
Ian Robinson
Registered User

Ian Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Gateshead
Posts: 2,205
Quote:
Originally Posted by bloodhound31 View Post
That's ok folks. I'm a bit upset, as I have grown quite attatched to this scope, but I will live I'm sure. Thanks for your condolences.



Ian, I am not sure if an AD claim would be legit but I am going to ask if it can be done. If not, it will have to be a personal loan I think. I think it is at the point where there is no point repairing. It will never be the same or up to standard again. It's time to replace.

Baz.
Well .... it was the result of accidentially overtightening the screws , so as long as the report from who ever you send it to for inspection states ACCIDENTIALLY DAMAGED is the cause in their report and quote to repair then the insurance company has no option but to accept and either replace the optics or the entire telescope or send you a cheque.
Is perfectly legit to make a claim.
This is why you pay insurance.

Last edited by Ian Robinson; 01-10-2008 at 11:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-10-2008, 12:48 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
I agree with Ian on that... You dont pay for insurance for your gear only to not use it when something gets damaged....

As far as the legitimacy of the claim, I take it when you tightened the screws on the corrector you did not intend to damage it...

My condolences for your loss... I must admit I whimpered a little bit at seeing it... and thought of my C11
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-10-2008, 01:33 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
I know that is no time to be jovial, and I'm truly sorry that this happened Barry, but If the insurance company wont cover this, then get someone to knock it off, and claim theft coverage.

Leon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement