ICEINSPACE
Moon Phase
CURRENT MOON
Waning Crescent 32.9%
|
|

27-02-2008, 11:20 PM
|
 |
1¼" ñì®våñá
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
|
|
Poll - what is your aperture?
What is the aperture of your scope? If you have multiple scopes, then please use your largest telescope aperture when you vote. Round off if you are inbetween somewhere
Past telescopes don't count, only interested in your current telescope!
|

27-02-2008, 11:35 PM
|
 |
Plays well with others!
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
|
|
My biggest is the 12.5 inch reflector Discovery truss dobsonian. Although it punches above its weight, I ticked 12 as it was the nearest whole number.
|

28-02-2008, 02:10 AM
|
 |
with my other baby
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South Hedland, WA
Posts: 64
|
|
I wonder what the results of this poll might have shown 10-15 years ago?
|

28-02-2008, 05:44 AM
|
Quietly watching
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Yarra Junction
Posts: 3,044
|
|
f you were to poll whether or not they were visual or photographic (dob or driven), i think you would find a lot of the large ones are dobs, possibly more of the smaller mounted.
|

28-02-2008, 06:16 AM
|
 |
Let there be night...
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal
Past telescopes don't count, only interested in your current telescope!
|
Current telescope - singular? Ahh.. you mean from the current flock....
|

28-02-2008, 08:37 AM
|
 |
1¼" ñì®våñá
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,845
|
|
I put current scopes and a 60 day limit on the poll so that this can be revisited a few years down the track. Can't go back in time to take a poll, but can plan for another one a couple of years into the future
I would say without a doubt that the average telescope size has increased over the last couple of decades, with John Dobson having the biggest impact!
|

28-02-2008, 09:49 AM
|
 |
I have detailed files....
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kellyville Ridge, NSW Australia
Posts: 3,306
|
|
I only have 5 inches, but it seems that everyone else has at least 8-12 inches.....the age old male problem.
You guys must be getting more spam emails than me.
Chris
|

28-02-2008, 01:27 PM
|
 |
The Glenfallus
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
|
|
In relation to the question about how the poll might vary 10 or 15 years ago, I have an old astronomy text which I bought in 1987 written by some Aussie amateurs (Reidy and Wallace, I think?), which discusses the equipment in use, as at that time. It was interesting to read over that section just recently and have a bit of a chuckle about how far things have come.
The biggest difference seems to be just how readily available, and reasonably priced, telescopes in the 8-12 inch range are now. It seems that perhaps 20 years ago a 6 inch scope was considered quite powerful.
|

28-02-2008, 01:53 PM
|
 |
~Dust bunny breeder~
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kal
What is the aperture of your scope?
|
8 inch.. or to be more specific the distance from one side of the mirror to the other
|

28-02-2008, 02:25 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hahndorf, South Australia
Posts: 4,373
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tbentley
I wonder what the results of this poll might have shown 10-15 years ago?
|
10-15 years ago I had a 12.5" Dark Star dob in the UK, but I know what you're getting at. Chinese mass production has now made the 10-12" range the norm, taking over from the 8" workhorse as the serious first scope.
Today though I've regressed to an 80mm refractor!!!!!
Cheers
Doug
|

28-02-2008, 02:35 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Gold Coast
Posts: 420
|
|
My largest and oldest scope is the 10" skywatcher, though it is a tiny bit bigger than that.
|

28-02-2008, 02:36 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
|
|
|

28-02-2008, 02:49 PM
|
 |
Let there be night...
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by leon
|
Ah yes, Leon - but it's the way that you use it.
|

28-02-2008, 03:33 PM
|
 |
Support your local RFS
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
|
|
From 1968 to 1976 I had my trusty Tasco 2.5"
From 1976 to 2006 it was the Celestron C8 and since 2006 it has been the Meade LX200R 12".
Who knows what the future holds but if the lotto gods smile upon me I would like to move up to a 16" RCOS.
Cheers
|

28-02-2008, 03:45 PM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wagga NSW.
Posts: 381
|
|
Currently using a Tasco 4.5", along with some 10x50 binoculars. Hoping to upgrade to a 10-12" Dobsonian in the near future.
|

28-02-2008, 05:15 PM
|
 |
Star Struck
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
|
|
Only 8 inches here...  Can't go wrong with that.
|

28-02-2008, 05:21 PM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
|
|
12" .... wishing for 16" or 20" and upgraded mount to match
|

28-02-2008, 08:38 PM
|
Its only a column of dust
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Iceland
Posts: 761
|
|
12" dob here
|

28-02-2008, 09:16 PM
|
 |
Country living & viewing
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
|
|
200mm here. Don't you love metric
|

29-02-2008, 08:23 AM
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 753
|
|
Unfortunately 200mm SCT is about biggest scope I can move. If I have money for permanent observatory I would be going for 350mm.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Rate This Thread |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:51 PM.
|
|