Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Solar System

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-10-2006, 08:10 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
registax 4 & imerge moon

Hi all. 2 nights ago I took a couple of moon shots through the 5.5" schmidt newt, couldn't fit the whole thing on the toucam chip so I took 2 AVI's with intentions of making a 2 frame mosaic using imerge.

So each AVI was a stack of 900 with a manual 3 point alignment in registax 4 & the 2 finals merged using imerge. Can't wait until the moons full

Cheers.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (imerge moon final big_filtered.jpg)
110.1 KB54 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-10-2006, 08:22 PM
RB's Avatar
RB (Andrew)
Moderator

RB is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 26,622
Wow asi-lunar-pod what a great shot !!!
I love the terminator and the smooth looking grey.

Excellent!
Bring on the full moon mate.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-10-2006, 08:30 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Nice quality work Asimov.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-10-2006, 09:55 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is online now
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,812
Hi Asi

Very nice 1st Qtr mosaic. I especially like the very natural look. Shadows and highlights very well contained and controlled - well done!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-10-2006, 10:38 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Excellent work, John. Nice wide field from the short f/l newt!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2006, 07:40 AM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Thanks guys. The 'containing & controlling' came at capture time by using filters (IR/UV cut / Fringe Killer / Contrasr booster) & a fairly high exposure rate. If one can do that, it means less proccess work after.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2006, 09:12 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
imerge hey? hmm...

better than autostitch?

nice image asi-lunar-mov
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2006, 12:54 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
Hi Vingster. I have not tried autostitch yet, but why bother if imerge does such a good job, which it seems to do. I'm satisfied in any case; but its only my first merge so I better test it more thoroughly first.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement