Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 25-10-2006, 09:37 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Galaxy imaging with DSI's

Hi all,
does anyone know of any imaging tips for capturing galaxies.
I have this problem where I can get the arm detail with a long exposure but tend to burn out the core or it's the opposite where I can take a shorter image and detail the core but lose the arms detail.

Any ideas/tips or a website link would be greatly appreciated.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25-10-2006, 10:02 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
you can combine images in photoshop cs in HDR or look up easy HDR. what you do is get your arms (by over exposing thw core) in one exposure and under expose the arms to capture the core in another (and maybe a shot in between too) and combine them.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 25-10-2006, 10:27 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Hi Ving, thanks for the advice, I'll give that a go. I use Maxim but I'm pretty sure I can achieve the same goal.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-10-2006, 01:12 AM
Gama's Avatar
Gama
Registered User

Gama is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,121
Why not just take shorter exposures and then just combine (Stack) them.
You then get the image you want. Plus stars tend to be much smaller and rounder.
Heres an image i took recently while trying to image very faint and small galaxies.
Its a small group of 5 galaxies with the barred spiral being 2.9 arc minutes and 14th Mag.
Since i wanted detail without bloating or saturation, i shortened exposures to 20 and 30 seconds each (I used a 22" f4.5 Newtonian and a SXV-H9) with a total combined 8 minutes.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc-7549.jpg)
137.6 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-10-2006, 10:24 AM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Thanks Gama, I try that as well, tonights looking pretty good so far.
Normaly my exposure times are 40 - 60 seconds so I'll try halving the exposure times and see how that goes.

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-10-2006, 12:54 PM
asimov's Avatar
asimov (John)
Planet photographer

asimov is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bundaberg
Posts: 8,819
http://www.astropix.com/HTML/J_DIGIT/LAYMASK.HTM
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-10-2006, 01:54 PM
Ric's Avatar
Ric
Support your local RFS

Ric is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wamboin NSW
Posts: 12,405
Thanks Asimov, I've just printed that off for a hard copy

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-10-2006, 02:57 PM
rogerg's Avatar
rogerg (Roger)
Registered User

rogerg is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 4,563
I use a combination of layers (with masks) and "Curves", only using Levels to chop the extremes.

If you can get the whole thing in to photoshop as a 16bit file (16bit TIF) then using curves is quite easy. My problem is converting a FIT to a 16bit TIF. All CCDSoft will do is 8bit TIF or 48bit TIF, my photoshop can't read 48bit TIF and 8bit TIF is too "shallow".

To combat that, I save about 3 TIF's, use curves on each and merge them with layers.

I have often wondered if something like ImagePlus gets around this, if it provides curves etc for use directly on the 16bit FIT files.

Oh, and it's a bit of a tricky trial and error process to get the brightness evenly spread but not make it look fake or have 'dead patches' of brightness where it looks obvious it shoudl be brighter. The M42 example at the previously posted link is OK but to me the core needs to be a bit brighter, because it should be.

Roger.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 26-10-2006, 04:15 PM
Doug
Registered User

Doug is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 645
The Jerry Lodregus link is also based on film images that obviously have been scanned. No difference to technique, but don't be guided by the pictorial too much. Look at the article section here on IIS there is an article detailing HDR processing,
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/index.p...63,294,0,0,1,0
or go to :
http://home.vicnet.net.au/~tishuios

I don't know what is going on with IIS, the last part of my web address is one word; it is displaying as two??? tishuios

Roger, hunt up 'fits liberator' plug in for photoshop. Mine loads fits @ 16bit.
If you have trouble finding it drop me a line.
Cheers,
Doug

Last edited by Doug; 26-10-2006 at 04:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement