Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Nightscapes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-05-2013, 02:17 PM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Mt Banks Rainbow

Well, here is my third attempt at getting this shot right, and I think that I am getting close. it troubles me to look at this version and think 'why didnt I up the exposure in processing' but I will do that tonight :-)

oh forgot the details :-)

Canon 7D
18mm, f3.5, 20s
two rows of 12 images (24) stitched.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (small-pano.jpg)
196.4 KB101 views

Last edited by adavis; 31-05-2013 at 05:42 PM. Reason: More Info
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-05-2013, 02:19 PM
Larryp's Avatar
Larryp (Laurie)
Registered User

Larryp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,244
Nice work, Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2013, 12:41 PM
ourkind's Avatar
ourkind (Carlos)
There is no substitute

ourkind is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,964
Oh that's stunning well done Andrew!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-06-2013, 01:08 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
That's really good! Now you just need more foreground
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-06-2013, 02:51 PM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
lol, yeah OK well the 6th trip out there will be the winner :-)
I didnt think of more foreground, bugger.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:05 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Foreground gives it context - a time and place.

It's not a nightscape without some foreground (in my books, anyway ).
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2013, 03:07 PM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Ok OK OK, very valid feedback
I'm heading back to Mt Banks this Saturday, so i'll give it another shot.
The moon will be much dimmer then too, so it is a worthy exercise.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2013, 04:41 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Did you have the camera on full manual? The right hand side panels are brownish. You need to lock exposure so it doesn't auto meter as you swing around.

You can get a higher frame by holding the camera in portrait orientation (you may've done that).

F3.5 is kind of slow - is that because the lens has aberrations wide open?

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2013, 05:35 PM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
Did you have the camera on full manual? The right hand side panels are brownish. You need to lock exposure so it doesn't auto meter as you swing around.

You can get a higher frame by holding the camera in portrait orientation (you may've done that).

F3.5 is kind of slow - is that because the lens has aberrations wide open?

Greg.
Camera was shot in Bulb mode, so I guess that is pretty much fully manual, I use an intervalometer to set exposure times and control shutter.
I think that the colour casting is due to the bright moon illuminating the left hand side and when the camera isnt looking at it the colour cast changes, not sure to be honest, but the exposures were all the same.

yeah it is portrait shots, two high, I just didnt think to get more foreground in the shot, not to mention that it was pitch black :-)

Unfortunately, f3.5 is the widest that this lens goes to, otherwise I would be definitely shooting wider open.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2013, 09:52 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by adavis View Post
Camera was shot in Bulb mode, so I guess that is pretty much fully manual, I use an intervalometer to set exposure times and control shutter.
I think that the colour casting is due to the bright moon illuminating the left hand side and when the camera isnt looking at it the colour cast changes, not sure to be honest, but the exposures were all the same.

yeah it is portrait shots, two high, I just didnt think to get more foreground in the shot, not to mention that it was pitch black :-)

Unfortunately, f3.5 is the widest that this lens goes to, otherwise I would be definitely shooting wider open.
I don't think the moon is the reason for that brown cast. I haven't seen that happen with any of my cameras (several brands). What does the exif data show about exposure details for those shots? Did you set a fixed white balance for all when processing? I usually process a RAW of one from a series in a panorama to where I like it then save the settings and simply apply them to the rest in the sequence. That works well.

No polariser on the lens is there? If that happens again I would suggest holding down the exposure lock button when taking the shots and not use an intervalometer.

The Samyang 14mm F2.8 lens is hard to beat bag for buck and you can load a distortion correction lens profile to correct that. It will help get a wider and higher image.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-06-2013, 04:43 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Andrew has the 7D, so the Samyang 14mm isn't very wide on a crop sensor.

I'd recommend the TOkina 11-16 f2.8.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-06-2013, 06:08 AM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
I don't think the moon is the reason for that brown cast. I haven't seen that happen with any of my cameras (several brands). What does the exif data show about exposure details for those shots? Did you set a fixed white balance for all when processing? I usually process a RAW of one from a series in a panorama to where I like it then save the settings and simply apply them to the rest in the sequence. That works well.

No polariser on the lens is there? If that happens again I would suggest holding down the exposure lock button when taking the shots and not use an intervalometer.

The Samyang 14mm F2.8 lens is hard to beat bag for buck and you can load a distortion correction lens profile to correct that. It will help get a wider and higher image.

Greg.
Hi Greg, thanks heaps for the pointers and suggestions, it is appreciated :-)

No Polariser, I would need to look at the WB but it wasnt on auto, in fact, nothing was on auto. I have seen the variable colour cast from Mt Banks before due to the different types of lights at each end of the pano.
On the right the glow cast is from the fog based street lights at Bell, where as in this image the moon gave a much whiter tinge to it.

I'm going back this weekend for another crack at it, and will do some playing around this time.

I didnt process the individual images beyond a lens profile before stitching, I processed them in LR after stitching as one, so that wasnt the issue either.

Yes, I am looking for a better lens, just trying to convince the minister for finance that it is a good idea :-)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:45 AM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
Andrew has the 7D, so the Samyang 14mm isn't very wide on a crop sensor.

I'd recommend the TOkina 11-16 f2.8.
Cool, thanks for the recommendation Mike, I am looking for a wider, lower aperture lens very soon, so that really helps out.
Thinking ahead, will that lens work ok with full frame sensor?

cheers
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:51 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
No

It won't work on a full-frame sensor. So it depends how long you plan on sticking with the 7D before you get itchy for full-frame

Not long I suspect
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-06-2013, 07:55 AM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceman View Post
No

It won't work on a full-frame sensor. So it depends how long you plan on sticking with the 7D before you get itchy for full-frame

Not long I suspect
hmmmm, arrrmm, hmmm, bugger.

I'm itchy, dont get me wrong, but having JUST bought the 7D, cant justify a full frame.
well, not this year at least, that just wont fly.

I got the 7D by stealth, we needed a family camera as we were sick of using iPhones and getting no photos of the kids in assemblies and band recitals.
Now we have fantastic photos of the kids, but yeah, Im left wanting :-)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-06-2013, 04:36 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
No Polariser, I would need to look at the WB but it wasnt on auto, in fact, nothing was on auto. I have seen the variable colour cast from Mt Banks before due to the different types of lights at each end of the pano.
On the right the glow cast is from the fog based street lights at Bell, where as in this image the moon gave a much whiter tinge to it.

I'm going back this weekend for another crack at it, and will do some playing around this time.

I didnt process the individual images beyond a lens profile before stitching, I processed them in LR after stitching as one, so that wasnt the issue either.

Yes, I am looking for a better lens, just trying to convince the minister for finance that it is a good idea :-)[/QUOTE]

Its an odd phenomena. Its hard to understand because I haven't seen it happen with my gear. Perhaps next time if it happens again try using the exposure lock or double check you are in fact in manual mode (bulb may not put it in manual mode??). Actually now that I think about it I have seen something similar with my 40D. Perhaps something is still on auto despite the settings (auto metering or auto white balance). I would try setting white balance to a specific temperature like 4200K.

I have my cameras set to manual mode and set the exposure using the internal camera exposure settings and set the ISO and white balance usually to 4200K and for the Nikon I knock down green and magenta one click - Canon would be different. I set the aperture manually. Focus is set and sometimes locked (with a piece of tape on the focus ring) or simply left alone. It can be tricky with a Polarie as the action of mounting it on the Polarie can knock the focus ring and put focus off.

Different brands have slightly different responses. For Fuji XE1 (best mirrorless low light high ISO low noise performer) and Sony Nex 6 auto white balance works really well. Fuji in particular has a fantastic white balance firmware, superior to other cameras I have used. Sony is good too but in a more automated way, noisier than the XE1 but still quite good. It really needs longer exposures and the 30 second style of shooting isn't deep enough to take much processing. XE1 is and Nikon D800E is quite a strong and deep signal (high sensitivity chip).

Its part camera, part lens, part tracking device, part Art! About equal doses of each!

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-06-2013, 07:19 AM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post

Its an odd phenomena. Its hard to understand because I haven't seen it happen with my gear. Perhaps next time if it happens again try using the exposure lock or double check you are in fact in manual mode (bulb may not put it in manual mode??). Actually now that I think about it I have seen something similar with my 40D. Perhaps something is still on auto despite the settings (auto metering or auto white balance). I would try setting white balance to a specific temperature like 4200K.
Good point, I will give that a crack for sure.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
I set the aperture manually. Focus is set and sometimes locked (with a piece of tape on the focus ring) or simply left alone. It can be tricky with a Polarie as the action of mounting it on the Polarie can knock the focus ring and put focus off.
Yep I figured out the focus trick myself, I have a rubber band that slips over the focus ring and holds it in place. The Canon 18mm-200mm zoom has a really loose focus ring in manual.

Im beginning to work it all out and get into a routine now, that has me checking the focus, the ISO, the aperture and the intervalometer timing maybe 5 times before I take a shot. I need to add WB and such other auto items in there too.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-06-2013, 09:11 AM
lacad01's Avatar
lacad01 (Adam)
The sky is Messier here!

lacad01 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Darwin
Posts: 2,587
Great image Andrew, nicely done
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-06-2013, 09:34 AM
adavis's Avatar
adavis (Andrew)
Registered User

adavis is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacad01 View Post
Great image Andrew, nicely done
Thanks, I'm going to have another crack at it this weekend to see if I can improve the shot.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 07-06-2013, 09:27 AM
matt34's Avatar
matt34 (Matt)
Registered User

matt34 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 267
Nice work Andrew, I bet it was fun trying to stitch all 24 images together.

My 2 cents re lenses is get ones that are full frame compatible. I'm a very recent convert to full frame and I'm so glad my investment in lens isn't wasted. When I first started buying additional lenses I never thought I'd go full frame but thought it was a way of future proofing myself. It also helped me justify the full frame purchase as I only needed a new body all my lenses still worked so it was "just" the cost of the body
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement