Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 04-06-2011, 12:55 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
NGC6188 in Ha

How's your astro IQ today?

See if you can spot where this "Running Horse Nebula" is located?

Or is it really 2 horseheads - one facing one way and one larger one facing the other way?

http://www.pbase.com/gregbradley/image/135260692

Here it is the full image:

http://www.pbase.com/image/135260951

Greg.

Last edited by gregbradley; 04-06-2011 at 01:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-06-2011, 12:56 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Too easy mate. The center of NGC6188. Do I win a CDK17"?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-06-2011, 01:02 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Too easy mate. The center of NGC6188. Do I win a CDK17"?

Ah a winner!

You just did NGC6188 so its fresh in your mind eh?

Yes your CDK17 is in the mail along with a cheque for $100 million!

Here is the full image:

http://www.pbase.com/image/135260951

Greg.

Last edited by gregbradley; 04-06-2011 at 01:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-06-2011, 03:41 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
If he's going to get $100 million, why buy a CDK17 when you can afford a 2 metre class scope....maybe even an uber CDK
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:27 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
That's going to look spectacular when complete.

I reckon, for now, just for display purposes, you can pump a fair amount of contrast in that image.

H
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:31 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
If he's going to get $100 million, why buy a CDK17 when you can afford a 2 metre class scope....maybe even an uber CDK
Yes a CDK700. 700mm aperture.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
That's going to look spectacular when complete.

I reckon, for now, just for display purposes, you can pump a fair amount of contrast in that image.

H
Thanks Humi. All I need is a clear night. I think I'll do NB on this one seeing Mikes and another one here that looked really good in NB.

Good call on increasing the contrast. I did that and it came up nicely.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:05 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Yep....not a bad bit of kit for US$185K.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:36 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Yep....not a bad bit of kit for US$185K.
Placing my order now...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:40 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Placing my order now...
I'd love to as well...just can't seem to win the Lotto!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:41 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Excellent pic Greg, but im puzzled why the level is so hi, looks a bit washed out?.

Oh, and I think a lazy 200mill would get you a CDK17000
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Gregs NGC6188 B.jpg)
170.6 KB26 views
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-06-2011, 07:36 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
Yeah Fred, nice scope that....17m mirror!!!!

Wonder what the Dawes Limit on that monster is??
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-06-2011, 07:45 PM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Nice clean image Greg but this target needs the wide field to add the extra oomph of this target. Better make this the start of a big mosaic.
Now that would be an interesting image, all this area done with the 17" WOW.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-06-2011, 10:48 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
Excellent pic Greg, but im puzzled why the level is so hi, looks a bit washed out?.

Oh, and I think a lazy 200mill would get you a CDK17000
It is a bit pushed. I might add some more exposure time to it to make it a bit stronger.

Quote:
Originally Posted by renormalised View Post
Yeah Fred, nice scope that....17m mirror!!!!

Wonder what the Dawes Limit on that monster is??
I should find out.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hagar View Post
Nice clean image Greg but this target needs the wide field to add the extra oomph of this target. Better make this the start of a big mosaic.
Now that would be an interesting image, all this area done with the 17" WOW.
Yes I agree. That lovely twisty bit of gas is bit further to the right. I think I will do that if enough clear skies come my way.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-06-2011, 11:08 PM
renormalised's Avatar
renormalised (Carl)
No More Infinities

renormalised is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,698
A CDK700 has a theoretical Dawes Limit of 0.166".

The 17000 (), has a theoretical limit of 0.00682"

Your scope has a Dawes Limit of 0.269"
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-06-2011, 10:00 AM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
It is a bit pushed. I might add some more exposure time to it to make it a bit stronger.
.
No its fine, I ment the level in PS could be lowered a bit, as in the attachment
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-06-2011, 10:38 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bassnut View Post
No its fine, I ment the level in PS could be lowered a bit, as in the attachment
Oh I see.

I got LRGB data last night when the weather cleared early at 12am.
So I'll be adding that now.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-06-2011, 08:38 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Hi Greg,

Another part of the sky I did not know existed.

Great photo.


Thanks.


Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement