Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 22-04-2010, 07:04 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Eta Carinae and Omega Centauri - single 60s exposures

These two images were taken on the Saturday night at the Mudgee Star Party.

They are single, uncropped 60s exposures taken in large jpeg while framing the object before starting an imaging run. Unfortunately when I started the imaging run and started taking 10 minute exposures, the guiding went funky and the exposures were terrible so I ended up giving up and getting some sleep in preparation for the drive home.

Modded 40D, ED80, WO 0.8x reducer, ISO1600. No flats, no darks, single 60s jpeg exposure.

It's a shame they didn't work out - I was looking forward to getting more data on these.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (eta-60SecISO1600_000003.jpg)
196.8 KB77 views
Click for full-size image (omega-60SecISO1600_000006.jpg)
153.3 KB67 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 22-04-2010, 07:13 AM
Garyh's Avatar
Garyh
Amongst the stars

Garyh is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Glen Innes, N.S.W.
Posts: 2,888
I love the framing and color of Eta shot Mike.. Pitty that you couldn`t get more exposures.
cheers Gary
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 22-04-2010, 08:18 AM
Hagar (Doug)
Registered User

Hagar is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,646
Both these came up nicely for just single exposures. Astrophotography can be frustrating at times. Sometimes it's better to go to bed and try again another day.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 22-04-2010, 10:31 AM
Paul Haese's Avatar
Paul Haese
Registered User

Paul Haese is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 9,991
The Omega looks great but the Eta colouring is not to my liking and looks a little black clipped. Given these are singles though they are good enough to be pleased with despite that fact. That said though I am guessing you are finding this more interesting than planetary imaging at present just like I am. Seeing can be so fleeting that one needs another distraction to take up the frustration. Well that is at least as I see it. Once the control issues are taken care of DSO is great because you just sit and watch TV or talk to friends while things are going on. You don't need to sit there constantly.

Keep it coming.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 22-04-2010, 12:53 PM
Tilt's Avatar
Tilt (Michael)
Registered User

Tilt is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Emerald, QLD
Posts: 564
Nice framing, a shame the guiding decided to pack it in. Imaging is a good test of patience, In the past I've been a whisker away from selling everything.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 22-04-2010, 01:03 PM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,814
Those are pretty tasty images for 60 sec uncalibrated exposures. And wow - the 40D mod really boosts the colours in Eta Carina. It’s also nice to see Omega Centauri in a wider stellar setting for a change.

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 22-04-2010, 04:03 PM
Terry B's Avatar
Terry B
Country living & viewing

Terry B is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Armidale
Posts: 2,790
I think it's pretty good. I did a similar thing in the past and took a single 5 min exposure with an unmodded 40D.
The image is here
http://www.iceinspace.com.au/forum/s...ad.php?t=31602
The comparison is interesting. My image isn't as red but it is an unmodded camera. The exposure is 5 times longer but both images have saturated stars. Eta will saturate with a 5 second exposure.
It's only the S/N that suffers with the short exposures of bright objects like eta Car.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 22-04-2010, 04:25 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Thanks for your comments - there's been many times where I've just wanted to throw it all in, but when you capture an image you're proud of, it can reignite the enthusiasm.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Haese View Post
.. but the Eta colouring is not to my liking and looks a little black clipped. Given these are singles though they are good enough to be pleased with despite that fact.
I agree it looks black clipped, but that's just because it was a 60-sec exposure in jpeg. There simply weren't enough exposures or a long enough exposure to lift the background levels any higher. I didn't adjust the black point at all.

Quote:
Originally Posted by paul
That said though I am guessing you are finding this more interesting than planetary imaging at present just like I am. Seeing can be so fleeting that one needs another distraction to take up the frustration. Well that is at least as I see it. Once the control issues are taken care of DSO is great because you just sit and watch TV or talk to friends while things are going on. You don't need to sit there constantly.

Keep it coming.
I don't really enjoy one more than the other at the moment, it's just been a matter of convenience that I've done deep space imaging in the last month or so. When I go to a dark sky site (pony club or mudgee star party), I don't take my planetary scope because it's just too big and I don't want to sit at the scope all night - I want to set up a run and then go and chat with people.
Also, when I'm at a dark sky site, that's the place to do deep space imaging (for me). I can do planetary imaging at home where light pollution doesn't matter.
I can't see myself doing any imaging for the next couple of months unless I can make it to a Pony Club meet, I'm just going to be too tired and in need of sleep!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Terry B View Post
The comparison is interesting. My image isn't as red but it is an unmodded camera. The exposure is 5 times longer but both images have saturated stars. Eta will saturate with a 5 second exposure.
It's only the S/N that suffers with the short exposures of bright objects like eta Car.
Interestingly, on the first night (and with my previous Orion Nebula image), the white balance was set on "Custom", where it's fairly balanced for daytime images. It did though, to make the images very blue.
On the second night, I set the white balance to Auto, and Eta Carinae came out much redder than it would have it was still set to custom. I didn't modify the colour temperature during RAW processing so that's how it came out of the camera.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 23-04-2010, 08:29 AM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Two real tidy and sharp shots. It's good to be back into it isn't it? I go through phases of no interest at times but I always have a ball with my ED80 too.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement