Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 12-09-2009, 09:06 AM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Seeing let this one down. Tarantula

Hi,

First processing from a bag of goodies from last night.
Thanks for the company Alex, Baz ....I hope your night
ended up better.

The focus may have been slightly off on this set, captured
around 2-3am but seeing definitely spoiled it.
The night started out way better so my NGC 253 is still
promising.

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (quality_crop_rotate_qm_laplacian.jpg)
161.0 KB57 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-09-2009, 10:41 AM
dpastern (Dave Pastern)
PI cult member

dpastern is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 2,874
Steve, better than anything I'm managing, keep at it. Focus does appear to be a bit off, but as you said, seeing can ruin things irrespective of how well you focus. Is this Ha or just mono?

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-09-2009, 01:27 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Looks nice Steve! a touch of deconvolution could probably make it look more focused? hard to say...

Was a fun night last night.. I managed to get to bed by 7:15 am after sharing a coffee and a plate of eggs on toast with my old man haha..
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:02 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Dave,

Mono only.
Alex, yes on the night a few different types of sharpening work
better or worse. It seems to be seeing dependent.
Good data responds very well to Laplacian sharpening.
Average data goes better with Unsharp mask.

No science here....I just do what works.

Here is NGC 253 from last night just after midnight.
Seeing was better, focus was better BUT it all got diminished by
the fact 253 is closer to the celestial equator than Tarantula (60s-ish)

Alex...get some sleep man!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Steve
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (253result_crop_qm_autolevels_umask.jpg)
176.7 KB19 views
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:10 PM
AlexN's Avatar
AlexN
Widefield wuss

AlexN is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Caboolture, Australia
Posts: 6,994
Sleep is for the week Steve... Weekends I have simply too much to get done to have more than 4~5hrs sleep.

That 253 looks fantastic! great detail in the dust lanes, stars look kind of big considering the resolution you regularly achieve. is this focus? or the seeing?

In any case, awesome work!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:21 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexN View Post
Sleep is for the week Steve... Weekends I have simply too much to get done to have more than 4~5hrs sleep.

That 253 looks fantastic! great detail in the dust lanes, stars look kind of big considering the resolution you regularly achieve. is this focus? or the seeing?

In any case, awesome work!
Yeah I can do this a few times even on a working week...but the catchup
sleep is usually an epic one!

Seeing mainly is the culprit here...obvious when viewing a sub frame.
Dialing the exposure back to 1 sec gets pinpoints again.
We can't have a winner night everynight....besides I think we would
kill ourselves from exhaustion!

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:50 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
Which camera were you using Steve?
253 looks great.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:50 PM
multiweb's Avatar
multiweb (Marc)
ze frogginator

multiweb is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 22,079
Looks pretty sweet to me Steve. I've always found the tarentula hard to photograph. Very messy object. Stars everywhere, looks mostly like a bag of noodle, hard to focus.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-09-2009, 05:56 PM
kinetic's Avatar
kinetic (Steve)
ATMer and Saganist

kinetic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Adelaide S.A.
Posts: 2,293
Quote:
Originally Posted by multiweb View Post
Looks pretty sweet to me Steve. I've always found the tarentula hard to photograph. Very messy object. Stars everywhere, looks mostly like a bag of noodle, hard to focus.
Well said Marc....

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjnettie View Post
Which camera were you using Steve?
253 looks great.
Its on the image JJJ...have you been drinking with Alex!?

Meade DSI Pro II mono

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-09-2009, 06:04 PM
jjjnettie's Avatar
jjjnettie (Jeanette)
Registered User

jjjnettie is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Monto
Posts: 16,741
You could say that.
I'm a zombie after last nights effort. Going to spend a delightful night tonight taking more wide fields while processing my images from last night.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 15-09-2009, 11:27 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Steve,

Once again, your NGC 253 is a corker.

I'm surprised by the amount of detail you pick up in those dust lanes. Amazing.

Regards,
Humayun
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement