Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Software and Computers
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 26-07-2009, 04:46 AM
turbo_pascale's Avatar
turbo_pascale (Rob)
Registered User

turbo_pascale is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 479
Registax 5 - file size problems

I took about 50Gb of AVI's tonight of jupiter.

Each one is slightly over 2Gb (unfortunately). I completely forgot about this being kind of painful in registax (it's been a year since I have attempted any imaging! very, very rusty on the details)

Anyway, even with the "Vista" and "Extended >2Gb" option turned on, it cannot read the AVI files I made. I took some much shorter AVIs (for a laugh) of Neptune, and they load OK, so it's not a codec or some strange setting - it appears to be purely file-size based.

What can I do to save all this work? Is there a way I can split the file in to smaller chunks easily without breaking anything? It was the first clear night on a weekend I can remember for a very long time, and seeing was pretty good, so I am really keen to have a go at these files.

Thanks.
Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 26-07-2009, 07:37 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Robert,

Registax 5 handles file sizes over 2gb without problem. What error are you getting?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26-07-2009, 07:40 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,811
Hi Rob

I have used VirtualDub to split AVI’s successfully so that Registax can then process them.

Cheers

Dennis

PS – I assume you are running Vista and not XP?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26-07-2009, 07:41 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
What codec did you record in?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26-07-2009, 10:44 AM
turbo_pascale's Avatar
turbo_pascale (Rob)
Registered User

turbo_pascale is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 479
Mike,

When I go in to the "Open File(s)" screen, if I click (just once) on the AVI, above the preview window it says "FILE CANNOT BE LOADED !"

Filename: jup0002 09-07-25 23-52-50.avi
Size: 2.19GB (2,360,921,088 bytes)

By Comparison, a neptune run (lots less frames!!)
Filename: nep0010 09-07-26 00-45-52.avi
Size 22.5 MB (223,674,880 bytes)

This just works.

Codec was Y800, video size is DBK31 native (ie 1024x768).
For most of the AVI's I ran 3000 frames at 30fps, a few of them 5000 frames.

The neptune ones, I had to use 5 second exposure just to see anything, hence only capturing a tiny amount of frames my comparison.

Dennis, I'll have to refresh my memory about Virtual Dub, been years since I touched that.

I am running Vista 64 if that is of any relevance. Last time I tried this stuff I was running 32 bit, and the older Registax 4 (or maybe 3!)

I might install on another PC just to prove it is Registax and not something else.

Thanks for your suggestions so far.

Turbo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26-07-2009, 10:49 AM
Dennis
Dazzled by the Cosmos.

Dennis is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 11,811
Okay. I’m on XP and I mistakenly had the Vista radio button selected and Registax would not load my 3000 frame AVI’s although they were less than 1GB.

When I then selected the radio buttons “Default” and “Avi>2Gb” everything worked okay.

Good luck with the problem resolution – imagine if you were the discoverer, processing the discovery images!

Cheers

Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26-07-2009, 10:11 PM
turbo_pascale's Avatar
turbo_pascale (Rob)
Registered User

turbo_pascale is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 479
I used VirtualDub to chunk up the files in to smaller pieces, and that seems to have solved the issue. Now just need to work out how to pick the best set of frames out of the 3 x 1000 frame chunks to merge them together for one stacking.

I'm assuming that this is fundamentally that the image size is much greater (1024x768 vs 640x480) hence it runs in to memory problems?

This pic is a slightly cropped image using all 1000 frames ("quality" never dropped below 95%).
Used the 10" LX200GPS at 6250mm (F25) with the Televue 2.5x barlow, and the Colour DBK31 at 30fps.

Focus could have been better, and I honestly think a collimation is in order as I don't think I've done that in years.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup0002 09-07-25 23-52-50(01)_cropped.jpg)
18.1 KB53 views

Last edited by turbo_pascale; 26-07-2009 at 10:24 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26-07-2009, 11:00 PM
turbo_pascale's Avatar
turbo_pascale (Rob)
Registered User

turbo_pascale is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 479
From 2000 frames, same setup, but without the barlow (ie 2500mm F10).
Ganymede & Io at bottom left of pic.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (jup0022 09-07-26 01-47-29(3)_cropped.jpg)
13.0 KB58 views
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement