Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Poll: Aperture or Portability?
Poll Options
Aperture or Portability?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 31-01-2008, 02:44 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Aperture vs Portability

If you were choosing a new telescope which is more important to you, Aperture or Portability?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31-01-2008, 02:58 PM
duncan's Avatar
duncan
Duncan

duncan is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Weipa FNQld
Posts: 1,091
Hi Matty,
I chose aperture as i have reasonably dark skies here. I also consider my 12"Dob portable.No different to putting any other scope in the car,ie; same precautions need to be taken. My wife is not into astronomy so if i go anywhere i'm on my own, room in the car is not important for a passenger.
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 31-01-2008, 03:00 PM
mick pinner's Avatar
mick pinner
Astrolounge

mick pinner is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: monbulk-vic
Posts: 2,010
after lugging a 12" SCT and pier around to a few get togethers l am certainly a portability guy now, even a 12" dob is a breeze compared to the other.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 31-01-2008, 03:08 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
For me aperture wins over portability. I don't move around a lot with the scope so the more aperture the better.

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 31-01-2008, 03:11 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Decisions, decisions!!

For where I currently live, it has to be portability, sadly.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31-01-2008, 03:41 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
I have chosen "portability" lately. I now have a high-quality APO refractor of small aperture that still gives great views with the right kind of EP and is fantastic for widefield photography. It'll get far more airtime than any other scope I own. It fits (with equatorial mount) into a single briefcase. It goes everywhere with me.

At the other end of the spectrum though - I'm still building my dual 12" binocular telescope - which isn't any where near as portable. Being a collapsible truss system it's still more portable than my 12" LX200GPS - which is too much for me to lug around any more. The views are phenomenal though a 12" bino.

If the question were: "If you were only able to have ONE, SINGLE scope...." than I'd have to answer "aperture". I'd then hire a slave to move it around for me.

Last edited by Omaroo; 31-01-2008 at 04:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31-01-2008, 03:53 PM
goober's Avatar
goober (Doug)
No obs, raising Harrison

goober is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 796
I've done both, and have finally settled on portability.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31-01-2008, 04:18 PM
leon's Avatar
leon
Registered User

leon is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warrnambool
Posts: 12,800
Yep portability is for me as well, if the set-up job is reasonably easy when on the road you would probably be prepared to use the set-up much more than having to lug around a big scope and mount, IMHO.

Leon
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31-01-2008, 04:20 PM
Jarrod
Professor Chaos

Jarrod is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong
Posts: 196
portability.

for me the 10" dob is big enough to keep aperture fever at bay, but too big to simply "throw in the boot" without having to consider luggage space. so if i was choosing another telescope i'd go for something small that i could travel with easily.

J
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-01-2008, 05:05 PM
edwardsdj's Avatar
edwardsdj (Doug)
Doug Edwards

edwardsdj is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
It's really a combination of the two for me. Largest possible apeture in a package I can fit in my small car.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-01-2008, 05:06 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
ps. I had a tow bar fitted to my little car today! I'm upping the portability aperture limit!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-01-2008, 05:09 PM
JethroB76's Avatar
JethroB76 (Jeff)
Registered User

JethroB76 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tassie
Posts: 1,104
Outgrown the 12' already Eric?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-01-2008, 05:12 PM
erick's Avatar
erick (Eric)
Starcatcher

erick is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gerringong
Posts: 8,548
Quote:
Originally Posted by JethroB76 View Post
Outgrown the 12' already Eric?
I've realised I need it for the 12" And I can get the 8" in as well for anyone else tagging along (and a few sets of binoculars!). Only one minor problem - what to do with all the camping stuff currently stored in the trailer
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31-01-2008, 05:14 PM
Karlsson
Registered User

Karlsson is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: in exile in Doha, Qatar
Posts: 159
Portability fever has cured my aperture fever...
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31-01-2008, 07:24 PM
Greenswale's Avatar
Greenswale (Wren)
Registered User

Greenswale is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 306
Portability for me just now - goes well with buzzing around the country.

BUT - have you seen those Britz hire campers? Maybe they are really mobile observatories - you know, opening roof and all? If this is true, then portability could mean pretty reasonable aperture? Must sneek up on a couple and have a look......!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 31-01-2008, 07:50 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Who says you cant have both? (two scopes)

I have my 15" truss dob for aperture, and the 130mm newt on porta mount for portability.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (vixsmall.jpg)
32.4 KB33 views
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 31-01-2008, 08:04 PM
wavelandscott's Avatar
wavelandscott (Scott)
Plays well with others!

wavelandscott is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ridgefield CT USA
Posts: 3,535
I love them both...but picking one I'd say portability...aperture in the garage/house/closet does not do you much good.


Great idea for a thread!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 31-01-2008, 09:11 PM
Rodstar's Avatar
Rodstar (Rod)
The Glenfallus

Rodstar is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central Coast, NSW
Posts: 2,702
I am indulging in an aperture phase right now.

And I am luckly enough that my scope is able to be wheeled out into position, fully assembled, in 30 seconds flat. But then, it takes a fair bit longer to pull it apart and reassemble it when travelling to a star party.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 31-01-2008, 09:55 PM
Matty P's Avatar
Matty P (Matt)
Star Struck

Matty P is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 2,797
Rod, how much does the "Mary Rose" weigh fully loaded?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 31-01-2008, 10:11 PM
thunderchildobs
Registered User

thunderchildobs is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ipswich, Qld, Aust
Posts: 636
Have multiple telescopes for different uses.

My 12inch LX200 was just luggable, but now permently mounted in the observatory, as it is now to heavy for my father to help me to lift it.

The 10inch lx200 is portablity enough for astrocamps,
while the C5 is the grab and go scope.

Brendan
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement