Quote:
We've yet to decide on a file size limit
|
We're open to a few suggestions on this - the 60k limit was for two reasons:
1) To keep the database size down
2) For dial-up users so the pages would load quicker if they had image attachments.
#1 isn't an issue now, as the attachments are stored on the filesystem.
#2 isn't an issue in the thread-view, as the images are showed as thumbnails, however generally you'd expect a lot of people to click the thumbnail to show the large version. We don't want dial-up users to have to wait minutes to show the large version of an image attachment.
So what i'm thinking, is the following:
- No dimension limits (eg: it can be 1024x800 as it's thumbnailed in thread-view)
- Size limit up to 100k for images, 500k for zip files
- Obviously it's still recommended to link to an offsite version if you want to show a 500k uncompressed image
Thoughts?
The 100k limit will mean the images don't need to be compressed as much when posting in the solar system/deepspace photography forums.