Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-05-2022, 11:25 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Lioness of Ara

Adding RGB stars to this NB vista was something of a challenge. That said the O-association stars are nicely resolved, something not seen too often
with other examples on the web.



The link is here


The h-alpha data was plagued by the dreaded CMOS banding which I finally resolved in OIII and SII runs by bumping up the gain and lowering the USB traffic figure. As to whether I'll do another Ha run? ...meh...maybe
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-05-2022, 12:03 AM
Pilgrim (Igor)
Registered User

Pilgrim is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Brisbane, QLD
Posts: 38
Fantastic! Very impressively deep looking image, cute tiny stars and fine processing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-05-2022, 07:53 AM
Startrek (Martin)
Registered User

Startrek is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Sydney and South Coast NSW
Posts: 6,667
Peter,
Lovely image
Just about as good as it gets
I see your not a fan of CMOS cameras but obviously starting to work them out with excellent results
Well done !
Martin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-05-2022, 09:27 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,783
Hi Peter,
that's a magnificent picture.
Thanks for sharing.


cheers
Allan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-05-2022, 09:47 AM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Excellent Stuff ....
The tiny stars and detail/contrast really help create a wonderful sense of depth/ 3D impression!

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-05-2022, 10:08 AM
Dave882 (David)
Registered User

Dave882 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: PADSTOW
Posts: 2,499
Wow and other stunning shot! I agree with JA it’s definitely got a very 3d appearance to it. Beautiful!!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-05-2022, 10:28 AM
Stephane's Avatar
Stephane
Registered User

Stephane is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 528
Peter, this image is just sensational (as are your others). May I ask what exposure time you use for your SHO subs, and what your exposure for your stars are?

Many thanks,
Stéphane
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-05-2022, 11:25 AM
PKay's Avatar
PKay (Peter)
Registered User

PKay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: DEPOT BEACH
Posts: 1,643
As good as it gets Peter.

Very well done
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-05-2022, 11:28 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilgrim View Post
Fantastic! Very impressively deep looking image, cute tiny stars and fine processing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek View Post
Peter,
Lovely image
Just about as good as it gets
I see your not a fan of CMOS cameras but obviously starting to work them out with excellent results
Well done !
Martin
Quote:
Originally Posted by alpal View Post
Hi Peter,
that's a magnificent picture.
Thanks for sharing.


cheers
Allan
Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
Excellent Stuff ....
The tiny stars and detail/contrast really help create a wonderful sense of depth/ 3D impression!

Best
JA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave882 View Post
Wow and other stunning shot! I agree with JA it’s definitely got a very 3d appearance to it. Beautiful!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephane View Post
Peter, this image is just sensational (as are your others). May I ask what exposure time you use for your SHO subs, and what your exposure for your stars are?

Many thanks,
Stéphane
Thank you one and all. The exposure details are on the linked page, just scroll down a tad.

That said SII got the Loin's share ('scuse the pun ) of the exposure run....7 hours worth due the low flux levels at that end. OII and Ha were 4 hours each. (all 5 minute subs).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31-05-2022, 09:57 AM
keller60 (Bill)
Registered User

keller60 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: The Continent
Posts: 51
As others have said "as good as it gets". Thanks for posting.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-05-2022, 10:02 AM
Retrograde's Avatar
Retrograde (Pete)
a.k.a. @AstroscapePete

Retrograde is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,720
It's a well-imaged target of course but your rendition really stands out.
That scope/flattener combo is something quite special.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 31-05-2022, 10:28 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retrograde View Post
It's a well-imaged target of course but your rendition really stands out.
That scope/flattener combo is something quite special.
Quote:
Originally Posted by keller60 View Post
As others have said "as good as it gets". Thanks for posting.
Thanks guys....ironically I cropped the field as the full frame view didn't have the same impact. I might have done better to simply use the field flattener (to get the same framing)

rather than reducer on this one, begging the question how much more exposure at F7.0 (vs F5.0) would have been needed.

Swings, roundabouts
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 31-05-2022, 02:05 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
...
rather than reducer on this one, begging the question how much more exposure at F7.0 (vs F5.0) would have been needed.

Swings, roundabouts
Well f/5 to f/7 is almost exactly a one stop difference, so you'd need twice* the exposure duration at f/7 compared with f/5 to capture the same amount of light. Of course then you'd have to track for twice as long, but i don't expect that would effect you Peter

Best
JA

*Approximately Twice, determined from the square of the aperture ratio (7/5)^2 = 1.96 ~ Twice
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 31-05-2022, 03:31 PM
pkinchington's Avatar
pkinchington (Peter (Kanga))
Registered User

pkinchington is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Posts: 303
Lovely final image.
cheers Kanga
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 31-05-2022, 05:25 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkinchington View Post
Lovely final image.
cheers Kanga
Glad you enjoyed the view

Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
Well f/5 to f/7 is almost exactly a one stop difference, so you'd need twice* the exposure duration at f/7 compared with f/5 to capture the same amount of light. Of course then you'd have to track for twice as long, but i don't expect that would effect you Peter

Best
JA

*Approximately Twice, determined from the square of the aperture ratio (7/5)^2 = 1.96 ~ Twice
Humm...didn't think it would make that much difference (actually on the stars, being a point source, then nil) but on extended objects...I'll take your word for it.

That said...I'd rather crop the data than go another 15 hours
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-06-2022, 07:36 AM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
A wonderful image. Showing the beauty of the AP155, arguably one of Roland's finest creations.

Good you got more of a handle on the banding.

Refractor images are hard to beat. They have an innate beauty about them.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-06-2022, 09:46 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregbradley View Post
A wonderful image. Showing the beauty of the AP155, arguably one of Roland's finest creations.

Good you got more of a handle on the banding.

Refractor images are hard to beat. They have an innate beauty about them.

Greg.
Thanks Greg....indeed if I could only keep one telescope, the AP155 would be it.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-06-2022, 01:21 PM
AstroViking's Avatar
AstroViking (Steve)
Registered User

AstroViking is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,243
Magic!!


Depending on where my eyes focused, I kept bouncing between the lioness and the fighting dragons...
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-06-2022, 01:54 PM
Shiraz's Avatar
Shiraz (Ray)
Registered User

Shiraz is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: ardrossan south australia
Posts: 4,918
yep, that is an exceptional image. Totally relaxing to view - everything looks "right". Cheers Ray
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-06-2022, 03:20 PM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shiraz View Post
yep, that is an exceptional image. Totally relaxing to view - everything looks "right". Cheers Ray

Thanks Ray...one could get used to these small pixels

Quote:
Originally Posted by AstroViking View Post
Magic!!


Depending on where my eyes focused, I kept bouncing between the lioness and the fighting dragons...
Ta. My colour mapping was not entirely arbitrary...the big kitty needed to have golden-hued fur.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 09:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement