I use dew heaters my imaging and guiding scope so really hope it wasnt dew.
Its a skywatcher evostar 72ed that i image with. I believe its a doublet refractor. So maybe thats a contributing factor.
And being its under 2hrs data i will definately be aiming to try and at least double that time on this object.
As far as processing i use photoshop with the carboni's astro tools action set.
Most of the processing is done using the action sets and levels with a slight curve and saturation increase.
Otherwise i dont touch much else with it. Still getting my head around masks etc and how they work.
So when you say look at the histogram and you can tell the data has been pushed too hard. Are you referring to the histogram not being a smooth curve and having those high and low peaks and troughs as it curves?
This is a bit of a rework. Got rid of those doughnuts which were just a processing artifact. The remaining halo on the stars is UV/IR bloat. It's on all my other images too.
https://www.astrobin.com/full/418966/0/