Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 29-12-2017, 09:15 PM
tim.anderson (Tim Anderson)
Registered User

tim.anderson is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cowra
Posts: 294
M42, 28 December 2017, Cowra NSW

Imaged using an ASI1600MC and a 126mm refractor on an EQ8 mount. Eighty 1-second images in each of the L, R, G and B channels, stacked in Nebulosity and processed in Photoshop.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Orion3.jpg)
99.8 KB95 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-12-2017, 09:28 AM
Peter Ward's Avatar
Peter Ward
Galaxy hitchhiking guide

Peter Ward is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Shire
Posts: 8,472
Sorry this is not an epic rendering of M42....not a lot of shadow detail, and quite a bit of noise. Begging the question: Why the one second exposures?

80 ten minute exposures in each channel, now that would be impressive
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-12-2017, 12:17 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Reminds me of the old hypered Fuji 400 days.

Maybe it's a nostalgia thing Peter?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-12-2017, 12:36 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Hi Tim,

Well composed with nice detail and I like the red colour.
There is a lot of noise.
What temp did you have the cooling at?
I have the same camera and the few shots I have been able to take I have had the cooling at -20, gain at 50 and my exposures have been from 2minutes to 5 minutes at F4.

Good luck.
Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-12-2017, 04:51 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Thank you for posting your image Tim.
I find it amazing you achieved such a good result with one second exposures.
Thanks again.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-12-2017, 10:37 PM
tim.anderson (Tim Anderson)
Registered User

tim.anderson is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cowra
Posts: 294
Yes, a lot of noise. I'm having trouble getting my darks to eliminate the noise in each of the monochrome channels. The 1-second images was a test, which seems to have come out rather nicely. At least it allows the Trapezium to show through while picking up a lot of the gas clouds. In this case, the red channel was actually imaged using a Sulphur narrowband filter. Go figure.

T
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 30-12-2017, 11:03 PM
spiezzy
Registered User

spiezzy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Helensburgh NSW
Posts: 367
nice work Tim noise smoise looks good to me you can look right into the trapezium great test result and as for the noise we have all been there on the learning curve and you are getting up the ladder with that result well done cheers Pete
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 30-12-2017, 11:28 PM
tim.anderson (Tim Anderson)
Registered User

tim.anderson is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cowra
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by spiezzy View Post
nice work Tim noise smoise looks good to me you can look right into the trapezium great test result and as for the noise we have all been there on the learning curve and you are getting up the ladder with that result well done cheers Pete
Thanks.

Tonight (first clear night here in Cowra since forever and despite a three-quarter moon in the same quadrant), I'm in the middle of collecting 60-second monochrome subs of the Horsehead and Flame. Same setup - an ASI1600MC, ASI filter wheel and a 126mm refractor. I'll post the results if they are interesting (after the inevitable 10 hours of integration).

Last edited by tim.anderson; 30-12-2017 at 11:45 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 30-12-2017, 11:40 PM
tim.anderson (Tim Anderson)
Registered User

tim.anderson is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cowra
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross G View Post
Hi Tim,

Well composed with nice detail and I like the red colour.
There is a lot of noise.
What temp did you have the cooling at?
I have the same camera and the few shots I have been able to take I have had the cooling at -20, gain at 50 and my exposures have been from 2minutes to 5 minutes at F4.

Good luck.
Ross.
-10 degrees, or at least that is what the software is telling me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30-12-2017, 11:53 PM
tim.anderson (Tim Anderson)
Registered User

tim.anderson is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cowra
Posts: 294
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ward View Post
Sorry this is not an epic rendering of M42....not a lot of shadow detail, and quite a bit of noise. Begging the question: Why the one second exposures?

80 ten minute exposures in each channel, now that would be impressive
Inigo Montoya springs to mind.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 31-12-2017, 03:23 PM
RickS's Avatar
RickS (Rick)
PI cult recruiter

RickS is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 10,584
That's a good result given the short subs, Tim. Now you just need to do some longer ones and do a HDR combine to get the best of both worlds (a Trapezium that isn't burned out and low noise in the dim areas.)

Cheers,
Rick.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement