Go Back   IceInSpace > Equipment > Equipment Discussions
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-03-2005, 12:55 AM
Howzat's Avatar
Howzat (Phil)
Technophile

Howzat is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camira, Ipswich
Posts: 105
Dave Ek's DSCs

Being a bit of a DIYer I've started building Steve Ek's DSCs
So far I've completed etching the PCB (see pic) and I've managed to get all the parts needed from Jaycar and Dick Smiths except for the crystal clock oscillator which i've ordered from Mouser Electronics
Luckily I have a PIC programmer that i built from a kit a couple of years ago so I can program the EEPROM myself.
I'm probably going to control it using my Zire 71 with PalmDSC. The serial cable for the Palm is probably the most expensive part (if you don't count the usb - serial adapter for my laptop) other than the US Digital S2 Optical Encoders I've ordered from BATSC
Tomorrow I'll start to solder the components to the PCB and try to find a box to hold it all in.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (dsc035.jpg)
61.7 KB224 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-03-2005, 01:24 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Been there, done that except I bought the pcb and the pic pre-programmed.

See my sig

Last edited by Starkler; 19-03-2005 at 01:26 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-03-2005, 05:32 AM
gbeal
Registered User

gbeal is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 4,346
Me too, and it is a very good unit. I use mine with the Palm, and also via a dongle to the PC.
Rob Beck is full of info if you need it, and suggest you PM him if you get stuck. (sorry Robby).
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-03-2005, 06:39 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Well done Howzat.. the DSC's are the best upgrade you'll do to your dob!

Good luck with it, can't wait to see it hooked up!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-03-2005, 08:38 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
I also have the EK DSC, but no encoders yet so havent connected it to the scope. I also have another circuit built by my dad which uses stepper motors for encoders, not accurate but it shows how it can be done.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-03-2005, 08:40 AM
ving's Avatar
ving (David)
~Dust bunny breeder~

ving is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The town of campbells
Posts: 12,359
now if only i had half a clue when it comes to electronics....

let us know how it goes
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 27-03-2005, 02:00 PM
Thiink
Registered User

Thiink is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 330
What sort of cost are you looking at for getting one of those built including the encoders?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 27-03-2005, 06:44 PM
Howzat's Avatar
Howzat (Phil)
Technophile

Howzat is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camira, Ipswich
Posts: 105
I already had the palm and a PIC programmer so....
2 X encoders @ $75 ea
1 X PIC16f84 @ $10
1 X case @ $12
1 X PCB etching kit @ $22
1 X Press & Peel Blue @ $35
misc other electronic components $15
1 X palm serial/usb cable @ $36
I also have a telephone cable lying around which I'll use to connect the encoders.
The only other expense will be mounting kit for the encoders. I still haven't decided wheather to build or buy yet

$280 so far, keeping in mind the etching kit, press & peel and serial cable will be used for other things
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 27-03-2005, 08:04 PM
Howzat's Avatar
Howzat (Phil)
Technophile

Howzat is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camira, Ipswich
Posts: 105
Here's the completed circuit board with all components. All I have to do is mount it in a case and mount the encoders and it should be good to go
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (im000073-small.jpg)
60.9 KB151 views
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 27-03-2005, 08:06 PM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Have you done the spark test?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 27-03-2005, 08:44 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Ive since heard that the oscillator module is an unneccessary expense, and can be replaced with a cheap 4mhz crystal and two ceramic caps. Mine cost me $20, $10 of that shipping from Farnells .

Sorry that doesnt help you Phil
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 27-03-2005, 08:46 PM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quick test.

Plug it into your pc running hyperterminal at 9600 baud and upon power up you should see "v2.0" on the screen.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 27-03-2005, 09:04 PM
Howzat's Avatar
Howzat (Phil)
Technophile

Howzat is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camira, Ipswich
Posts: 105
Quote:
Originally posted by Starkler
Ive since heard that the oscillator module is an unneccessary expense, and can be replaced with a cheap 4mhz crystal and two ceramic caps. Mine cost me $20, $10 of that shipping from Farnells .

Sorry that doesnt help you Phil
Yeah I read that but the osillator only cost me US$1.58 ea (I ordered 5) and US$12 postage


Quote:
Quick test.

Plug it into your pc running hyperterminal at 9600 baud and upon power up you should see "v2.0" on the screen.
I wasted half a day testing it with hyperterminal, pressing Q to try and get +000 +000 until I read that the Version 2 firmware showed V2.00 at power on and reset

Quote:
Have you done the spark test?
Luckily no smoke came out as its a bugger to get it all back in
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 27-03-2005, 10:57 PM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
I used the X-tal and two 15pF Caps on mine, works well. Need to get a couple of encoders for mine.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 27-03-2005, 11:50 PM
Vermin's Avatar
Vermin (Tom)
Cloud dodger

Vermin is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hobart
Posts: 584
I've been thinking of upgrading to the 10K step encoders for my Argo Navis. Which means I would have a couple of 8192 step encoders for sale. They are brand new (never used, still in packaging). They cost AUD $149 each, PM me with an offer if you are interested. Keep in mind the new 10k step encoders only cost $80 ea.

Mechanical drawing here:

http://www.wildcard-innovations.com....ncoder_dim.gif

Last edited by Vermin; 27-03-2005 at 11:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 28-03-2005, 06:55 AM
iceman's Avatar
iceman (Mike)
Sir Post a Lot!

iceman is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gosford, NSW, Australia
Posts: 36,799
Is it worth spending extra if you already have 8192 step? I thought that the difference (in operation and pointing accuracy) would be negligble, or impossible to detect.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 28-03-2005, 07:37 AM
Robby's Avatar
Robby
Registered User

Robby is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 1,079
I wouldn't bother upgrading to 10k step encoders.
Unless your telescope is perfectly polar aligned and you had zero mount errors (virtually impossible) you won't notice the difference.
FYI. We used 4k step encoders on Mike's 10" with AN at SPSP and had excellent pointing!
Cheers
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 28-03-2005, 08:14 AM
Astroman's Avatar
Astroman (Andrew Wall)
<><><><>

Astroman is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Paralowie, South Australia
Posts: 4,367
Is it true you can get better encoder readings from gearing the encoder? Not directly attached to the mounts axis of rotation.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 28-03-2005, 09:38 AM
Starkler's Avatar
Starkler (Geoff)
4000 post club member

Starkler is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,900
Quote:
Originally posted by Astroman
Is it true you can get better encoder readings from gearing the encoder? Not directly attached to the mounts axis of rotation.
The kit I have on mine has a gear on the centre azimuth pivot bolt and a cheaper 2000 step encoder to give 4000 steps effectively. This introduces potential inaccuracies with keeping the gears properly meshed, tolerances etc. Better to avoid gears if possible and use the highest resolution encoders attached directly to the axis of movement.

As for upgrading from 8192 to 10000 step encoders I wouldnt bother either as there would be little to gain.

Last edited by Starkler; 28-03-2005 at 09:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 28-03-2005, 09:49 AM
Howzat's Avatar
Howzat (Phil)
Technophile

Howzat is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Camira, Ipswich
Posts: 105
I've heard you can lose accuracy with encoders of higher resolution as the interface can "skip" because too much information is coming in, especially if you turn the scope too fast.
Gearing down the encoders would have the affect of slowing the rotation of the encoders and preventing this skipping.
of course if you have low res encoders (like mouse encoders) gearing up would have the affect of increasing tics per rotation
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 04:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement