Being a bit of a DIYer I've started building Steve Ek's DSCs
So far I've completed etching the PCB (see pic) and I've managed to get all the parts needed from Jaycar and Dick Smiths except for the crystal clock oscillator which i've ordered from Mouser Electronics
Luckily I have a PIC programmer that i built from a kit a couple of years ago so I can program the EEPROM myself.
I'm probably going to control it using my Zire 71 with PalmDSC. The serial cable for the Palm is probably the most expensive part (if you don't count the usb - serial adapter for my laptop) other than the US Digital S2 Optical Encoders I've ordered from BATSC
Tomorrow I'll start to solder the components to the PCB and try to find a box to hold it all in.
Me too, and it is a very good unit. I use mine with the Palm, and also via a dongle to the PC.
Rob Beck is full of info if you need it, and suggest you PM him if you get stuck. (sorry Robby).
I also have the EK DSC, but no encoders yet so havent connected it to the scope. I also have another circuit built by my dad which uses stepper motors for encoders, not accurate but it shows how it can be done.
I already had the palm and a PIC programmer so....
2 X encoders @ $75 ea
1 X PIC16f84 @ $10
1 X case @ $12
1 X PCB etching kit @ $22
1 X Press & Peel Blue @ $35
misc other electronic components $15
1 X palm serial/usb cable @ $36
I also have a telephone cable lying around which I'll use to connect the encoders.
The only other expense will be mounting kit for the encoders. I still haven't decided wheather to build or buy yet
$280 so far, keeping in mind the etching kit, press & peel and serial cable will be used for other things
Ive since heard that the oscillator module is an unneccessary expense, and can be replaced with a cheap 4mhz crystal and two ceramic caps. Mine cost me $20, $10 of that shipping from Farnells .
Originally posted by Starkler Ive since heard that the oscillator module is an unneccessary expense, and can be replaced with a cheap 4mhz crystal and two ceramic caps. Mine cost me $20, $10 of that shipping from Farnells .
Sorry that doesnt help you Phil
Yeah I read that but the osillator only cost me US$1.58 ea (I ordered 5) and US$12 postage
Quote:
Quick test.
Plug it into your pc running hyperterminal at 9600 baud and upon power up you should see "v2.0" on the screen.
I wasted half a day testing it with hyperterminal, pressing Q to try and get +000 +000 until I read that the Version 2 firmware showed V2.00 at power on and reset
Quote:
Have you done the spark test?
Luckily no smoke came out as its a bugger to get it all back in
I've been thinking of upgrading to the 10K step encoders for my Argo Navis. Which means I would have a couple of 8192 step encoders for sale. They are brand new (never used, still in packaging). They cost AUD $149 each, PM me with an offer if you are interested. Keep in mind the new 10k step encoders only cost $80 ea.
Is it worth spending extra if you already have 8192 step? I thought that the difference (in operation and pointing accuracy) would be negligble, or impossible to detect.
I wouldn't bother upgrading to 10k step encoders.
Unless your telescope is perfectly polar aligned and you had zero mount errors (virtually impossible) you won't notice the difference.
FYI. We used 4k step encoders on Mike's 10" with AN at SPSP and had excellent pointing!
Cheers
Originally posted by Astroman Is it true you can get better encoder readings from gearing the encoder? Not directly attached to the mounts axis of rotation.
The kit I have on mine has a gear on the centre azimuth pivot bolt and a cheaper 2000 step encoder to give 4000 steps effectively. This introduces potential inaccuracies with keeping the gears properly meshed, tolerances etc. Better to avoid gears if possible and use the highest resolution encoders attached directly to the axis of movement.
As for upgrading from 8192 to 10000 step encoders I wouldnt bother either as there would be little to gain.
I've heard you can lose accuracy with encoders of higher resolution as the interface can "skip" because too much information is coming in, especially if you turn the scope too fast.
Gearing down the encoders would have the affect of slowing the rotation of the encoders and preventing this skipping.
of course if you have low res encoders (like mouse encoders) gearing up would have the affect of increasing tics per rotation