Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 02-10-2014, 09:47 PM
StrainHardening (Jock)
Registered User

StrainHardening is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sydney
Posts: 8
Do you need a tracking mount to take long exposure images? and other questions

Hi

I've tried googling this question but I read a lot of things that I don't understand.

Do I need a tracking mount/electronic mount which tracks objects in order to take long exposure photographs?

Also, would this sensor be suitable for astrophotography? http://store.sony.com/interchangeabl...ollections-ifa
You can tell it to take a photo using your phone so you dont bump the telescope, if i'm reading the specifications correctly then it has up to 30 second exposure time?

I'm a very begginer astronomer. I've done some planetary viewing lately, saturn, jupiter@4am and the moon (I know it's not a planet ). I've seen some stars but they all look like bright dots. I was hoping to see a bit more detail with photography.

The telescope i'm using is the sky watcher sw102 100/500.
Do I need a better telescope if I want to take picture of deep space objects?

Thanks for any help
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2014, 10:36 PM
mithrandir's Avatar
mithrandir (Andrew)
Registered User

mithrandir is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Glenhaven
Posts: 4,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by StrainHardening View Post
Hi

I've tried googling this question but I read a lot of things that I don't understand.

Do I need a tracking mount/electronic mount which tracks objects in order to take long exposure photographs?

Also, would this sensor be suitable for astrophotography? http://store.sony.com/interchangeabl...ollections-ifa
You can tell it to take a photo using your phone so you dont bump the telescope, if i'm reading the specifications correctly then it has up to 30 second exposure time?

I'm a very begginer astronomer. I've done some planetary viewing lately, saturn, jupiter@4am and the moon (I know it's not a planet ). I've seen some stars but they all look like bright dots. I was hoping to see a bit more detail with photography.

The telescope i'm using is the sky watcher sw102 100/500.
Do I need a better telescope if I want to take picture of deep space objects?

Thanks for any help
This is pretty much a Sony NEX camera without the usual camera shape body. It has no memory card and transmits the images to your phone. It should be fine. You will need a T-mount adapter to attach it to the scope. I recommend the ones by http://www.telescopeadapters.com/

They have a specific one piece E-mount adapter. In fact I'm waiting for one and a clear filter to be delivered for my a7s.
  • T2NEX - T-Minus Adapter for Sony NEX Cameras
  • T2FLT - 48mm Clear Filter for True-2

I don't have any experience with Skywatcher scopes, but at 500mm you will either have to restrict yourself to 1 sec images or get a tracking mount.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-10-2014, 10:49 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
You can take wide angle images with just a camera and a tripod, with exposures up to around 2 minutes, depending upon the lens you use, and where in the sky you point it.
To take worthwhile images through any telescope you do need a tracking mount. It can be fairly basic, with just a simple drive
motor.
The camera is almost certainly not good for astrophotography, firstly
because 30 secs is not long enough. Secondly, smartphones are really
not up to to the task, if you are looking to take decent quality pics.
For less than the price of that camera you can get a Canon 1100D
DSLR, which is much more versatile and suitable.
Your present scope will do the job, but will suffer from chromatic
aberration [violet and/or yellow, fringes] around bright stars and the
moon.
Quality deep sky images are not easy to produce; I suggest that you
get a book on the subject. It's a long, steep learning curve, and can be
very expensive. Start simple, and persevere.
The Sony camera will do for basic phone camera use, but I think that
you will want to move up a step before too long. If you only want to
dabble, the Sony would do.
raymo

Last edited by raymo; 02-10-2014 at 10:55 PM. Reason: more info
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement