Go Back   IceInSpace > Beginners Start Here > Beginners Astrophotography
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 01-09-2014, 11:44 AM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
first try at Helix.

Got out at last, between clouds. Quick align only allowed 45 sec subs;
neighbour's wood smoke destroyed 20 of 50 subs, and high cloud
ruined another 9, so nowhere near enough data, but it's a start.
21x 45 secs @ 3200 8" Newt f/5.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (helix-2-down.jpg)
191.0 KB92 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2014, 01:26 PM
rustigsmed's Avatar
rustigsmed (Russell)
Registered User

rustigsmed is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Mornington Peninsula, Australia
Posts: 3,996
nice work Ray, I've started collecting some data too, she's a faint one!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2014, 01:49 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Cheers Russell, this one is going to be a bit of a challenge, with the
basic technique that I use.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2014, 02:22 PM
cometcatcher's Avatar
cometcatcher (Kevin)
<--- Comet Hale-Bopp

cometcatcher is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cloudy Mackay
Posts: 6,542
That's a nice one Ray.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2014, 03:40 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Kevin, it was a struggle last night.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2014, 03:52 PM
glend (Glen)
Registered User

glend is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Lake Macquarie
Posts: 7,121
Well Raymo you ahve inspired me to give the Helix ago - if we ever get clear skies again on the east coast.

I assume you had to reduce the size of your image to post it here. How exactly does one do that? My images are large files and if I save them as jpgs they seem to lose massive amounts of detail.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2014, 04:33 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Hi Glen, last night was my first chance in 11 weeks because of the weather. Regarding downsizing, I do it in Photoshop[of which I have an ancient version]. It has a "downsize for the web" feature . I expect somebody else here will tell you another way if you don't have PS.
I suspect that somewhere in all the software that came with my Canon
there will be a means of doing it. The best way for you would be to join
Astrobin or similar, where all your high res images can be stored, and you can put a link to them in your posts. And it's free [although donations
gratefully accepted.]
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2014, 05:07 PM
BruceG's Avatar
BruceG (Bruce)
Registered User

BruceG is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 367
I know what you mean about the clouds Raymo. I think you have done a stunning job considering how little integration time you have. 3200 ISO - that 1100D is a pretty quiet machine all things considered. I too got out last night and made my first attempts at Helix. I haven't even looked at any subs yet. I'll get on to that tonight as the clouds are back.
Cheers, Bruce.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2014, 05:25 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Bruce. Owing to the rough and ready alignment I was limited to short subs, so had to use 3200 in order to get any worthwhile data.
If it is clear tonight I'll use 1600. Now we have the moon to contend with.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:05 PM
LightningNZ's Avatar
LightningNZ (Cam)
Registered User

LightningNZ is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Canberra
Posts: 951
Looks like a great first try to me!

Really nice having a decent focal length for such objects. My little AT65EDQ leaves the Helix looking very small.
Cheers,
Cam
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:16 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Cam; Any serious imager who can afford it, really needs larger
aperture and/or longer focal length, on occasion. I can't afford an APO as well as my 8"Newt, so I think my scope is a good compromise.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-09-2014, 07:40 PM
Bassnut's Avatar
Bassnut (Fred)
Narrowfield rules!

Bassnut is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torquay
Posts: 5,065
Well done Raymo. The Helix has a pretty low surface brightness. 45sec subs on a DSLR is illegal on the Helix, no normal person would attempt it. Your lucky you got away with it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-09-2014, 09:03 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thankyou very much Fred. I hope you don't dob me in to the correctness
cops. Next clear night I'll go for longer subs, and 1600 ISO.
raymo
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-09-2014, 09:45 PM
nebulosity.'s Avatar
nebulosity. (Jo)
Registered User

nebulosity. is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cecil Plains QLD
Posts: 1,228
As always, great stuff Raymo

Wish you were over here to make use of our awesome skies at present.

Jo
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-09-2014, 09:51 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Jo, so do I. I've had another go at it, so here it is.
raymo
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (helix-2-yet-again.jpg)
189.4 KB17 views

Last edited by raymo; 01-09-2014 at 11:15 PM. Reason: extra pic
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 02-09-2014, 04:09 PM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,478
Looking good raymo your noise is way better than mine

I want to try this now before it disappears, there's a lot of signal there for such short exposure time.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 02-09-2014, 07:32 PM
Rex's Avatar
Rex
Registered User

Rex is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Townsville, Australia
Posts: 991
That's pretty good Raymo. For such a short total integration time you showing some good detail.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 02-09-2014, 07:54 PM
raymo
Registered User

raymo is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: margaret river, western australia
Posts: 6,070
Thanks Rex. The reprocessing improved it somewhat, but I have to get out there again as soon as possible.
raymo
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement