Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Nightscapes
Register FAQ Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 19-07-2013, 11:15 AM
matt34's Avatar
matt34 (Matt)
Registered User

matt34 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 267
My Next NZ Vertorama

Hi All

I'm after some opinions on an early stitch of another vertorama from my NZ trip earlier in the year. I'm a little torn on which one I like better.

There hasnt been any real processing done to these yet just basic NR then stitching/cropping. I'm trying to think which version of the shot I should look to spend my limited processing time on. There is a little more data on some of the sides that I might be able to recrop/restitch with a different projection.

Anyway I thought I'd open it up to the forum here after the great suggestions with my last vertorama.

1 - Full horizon to Horizon Shot on the road to Mt Cook
2 - View up towards Mt Cook Village
3 - View to the south with my trusty ride for the trip in the shot.

Let me know which one you think I should concentrate on

Cheers

Matt
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (_MG_1250 Panorama-IIS.jpg)
181.6 KB55 views
Click for full-size image (_MG_1250 Panorama-IIS (2).jpg)
171.9 KB54 views
Click for full-size image (_MG_1250 Panorama-IIS (3).jpg)
142.6 KB50 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19-07-2013, 02:42 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Number 2 wins.

And, number 1 would be better if you cropped from the bottom so that the top and bottom parts of the landscape are equal in length. Because the Milky Way is going straight up and down, through the middle, it would help the composition if both the top and bottom landscape were also equal. That's my take from an artistic/compositional point of view.

H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-07-2013, 02:59 PM
matt34's Avatar
matt34 (Matt)
Registered User

matt34 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ballarat, Australia
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane View Post
Number 2 wins.

And, number 1 would be better if you cropped from the bottom so that the top and bottom parts of the landscape are equal in length. Because the Milky Way is going straight up and down, through the middle, it would help the composition if both the top and bottom landscape were also equal. That's my take from an artistic/compositional point of view.

H
Thanks for the feedback H.
So you mean with no 1 to have as much landscape in the top and the bottom (cropping the bottom so there is a similar amount?) I originally had it up the other way but thought the land was too heavy and the car "grounded" the shot, so I think I get what you mean there isnt balance in the ground/sky
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-07-2013, 05:04 PM
Octane's Avatar
Octane (Humayun)
IIS Member #671

Octane is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 11,159
Yep, precisely.

H
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24-07-2013, 09:06 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
Great looking photos Matt.

Number 2 is also my favourite. It has the most "balanced" composition.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement