Taken last night at IISAC2013, a quick process this morning while transferring GB's of images to an external drive so I can format the CF/SD cards and go again tonight!
50mm, 6D, Polarie, 30s.
Have now added a 200kb version too.
EDIT: This was originally processed in a bright room out at IISAC. Based on feedback I've now added some more contrast. Here's the new version.
me too - kicking myself for not being able to make it to IISAC2013, had my camping gear sorted and all! The upside I guess is my prior commitments up the Hunter Valley Vineyards!!
Certainly is possible, Mike. I had even planned it, using Sky Safari Pro and the compass to see if the Milky Way would rise behind those trees, and it did
It's tracked on the Polarie for the sky, and an untracked shot for the foreground. Both 30s.
Wish you were here, Mike. Chris couldn't make it either but Guy and I are giving Fred heaps
Certainly is possible, Mike. I had even planned it, using Sky Safari Pro and the compass to see if the Milky Way would rise behind those trees, and it did
It's tracked on the Polarie for the sky, and an untracked shot for the foreground. Both 30s.
Wish you were here, Mike. Chris couldn't make it either but Guy and I are giving Fred heaps
He he...ah Freddo, gotta love...or hate...him
No, what I meant was, how can the Milky Way look as bright down on the horizon as it does further up, that is not real...is it? The atmospheric extinction down that low is very heavy...?
Nice Capture Mike, how cool a view is that with a 50mm
Quote; Re Mike,
No, what I meant was, how can the Milky Way look as bright down on the horizon as it does further up, that is not real...is it? The atmospheric extinction down that low is very heavy...?
Just a stab in the dark, looking as been taken low with the hill in the foreground, giving the horizon and actual sky view starting at possibly 5-10 deg higher than true level horizon, if that makes sence ? ?
Tho, Im normally wrong on these things, or to stupid & have spoken out of turn, maybe should have kept quiet
Last edited by astronobob; 13-04-2013 at 10:03 PM.
Just a stab in the dark, looking as been taken low with the hill in the foreground, giving the horizon and actual sky view starting at possibly 5-10 deg higher than true level horizon, if that makes sence ? ?
Tho, Im normally wrong on these things, or to stupid & have spoken out of turn, maybe should have kept quiet
I think you're on the right track here astronobob.. I think that hill cuts off a good deal more than 10 degrees so the extinction could be relatively low.
Great shot Mike! Very impressive. I think if you were processing this on your home monitor you would have the levels a bit darker/more contrasty? Is this still processed with your old laptop or did you get the upgrade already?
No, what I meant was, how can the Milky Way look as bright down on the horizon as it does further up, that is not real...is it? The atmospheric extinction down that low is very heavy...?
Mike
Ok, looking at Irish Johns result seems it is possible, don't mind me I am just a fledgling greenhorn DSLR nightscape imager
I think you're on the right track here astronobob.. I think that hill cuts off a good deal more than 10 degrees so the extinction could be relatively low.
Great shot Mike! Very impressive. I think if you were processing this on your home monitor you would have the levels a bit darker/more contrasty? Is this still processed with your old laptop or did you get the upgrade already?
Phil
Thanks Phil, I processed it during the day at Lostock so looking at it now, I agree a bit more contrast is in order.
I haven't upgraded yet either
Quote:
Originally Posted by Octane
Awesome, Mike.
Agree with Phil -- needs a bit more contrast to really punch home.
Say hi to Fred and Guy from me.
H
Thanks H, shame you couldn't make it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by strongmanmike
Ok, looking at Irish Johns result seems it is possible, don't mind me I am just a fledgling greenhorn DSLR nightscape imager
Go Lostock IISAC
Mike
I thought you would've remembered that hill? It was taken from where we were setup last year so looking up towards the trees, John and Phil are right - at least 10degrees of sky is blocked by the mountain.