I've owned an EQ6, then a CGEM then a G11 in that order. I tend to image most at long (well over 1500mm) focal lengths so any problems in the mount performance tend to rear their ugly head.
Externally, the G11 looks the best finished of the lot and has the sturdiest tripod by far, that thing is a tank! But when you dig deeper, tolerances are sloppy and some things are just plain poor design.
As for performance, out of the box the CGEM was the best performer, the G11 had a PE of over 30, even after adjustments, and also had the 76s error which I couldn't get around with an autoguider and this made PEC a useless waste of time. The adjustment dials were also considerably off and tt also had the problem with the clutch being difficult to get tight enough. This turned out to be a problem with the clutch plate not being machined flat enough, as per this page.
http://www.helixgate.net/g11.html
After adding an Ovision worm the G11 finally performs as well as I think it should straight out of the box for the cost of the thing, and it is usable at long focal lengths. I really think their quality control is little better than the Chinese mounts, I expected better considering the cost and reputation, but really the G11 is in the 'budget mount' category.
I tested the losmandy single block worm (like this one
http://www.helixgate.net/G11opw3.html) as well, but the Ovision is far far better.
The G11 is an okay mount, it isn't worth the price differential over an EQ6 in my opinion, especially if you are going to use it on a pier.
You could get an EQ6, have it reworked/hypertuned and get an adaptive optics unit for less than the cost of a G11 and get better results and have cash left over.
With any of these cheaper mounts, if you luck out and get an exceptional one, you do very well with it. If you don't and are willing to strip them down and rework them, then any of them work very well. The G11 *can* be a really good mount, but it takes some work to get there, just like the other two contenders.
If the mount was $1999 I'd say it was a good deal, at over 4K optioned up I think it should be a lot better than it is, and I would rather save up and get a Mach1 which is a massive step up in quality.
Or I'd rather save the money and get an EQ6 and trick it out and put the extra money to better use.