Go Back   IceInSpace > Images > Deep Space

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 08-05-2012, 06:58 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
I think I have won!

While waiting for the cloud to clear I decided to tilt the RH200 so it pointed at the deck. I then loosened both Zero Tilt Adapters sequentially and made sure everything was fully home before retightening the bolts. This would eliminate any small misalignment in the image train due to assembling in the horizontal position.

After the cloud finally went away I took a series of exposures in HA. Each exposure differed by 200 steps of the Atlas focuser or about 20 micron of travel..

Here is the single 4 minute exposure where focus was best. No flat or dark correction.
Full resolution 10MB

http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co..._-007_240s.jpg

Managed to get some quick data. This is 10x4 min with 3nm NII of the SMC processed upsized at x1.6 in size. 5MB

http://d1355990.i49.quadrahosting.co.../SMC_NII_L.jpg

Note this was collected with a near full Moon and the SMC fairly low in a light polluted sky.

It is obvious something was not fully inserted home. I may not need to touch the back plate adjustment at all.

The guiding still needs a bit of tweaking.

Bert

Tomorrow the weather report is favourable. We live in hope.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (Test_ha_-007_240ssm.jpg)
50.9 KB81 views
Click for full-size image (SMC_NII_Lsm.jpg)
162.2 KB109 views

Last edited by avandonk; 08-05-2012 at 07:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-05-2012, 08:13 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Wow, huge improvement. Suddenly, all the stars are looking much tighter. I don't think I've seen the SMC in NII. I can imagine 4 or 5 hours on this, rendering a super smooth, noise free image.

j
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2012, 08:15 AM
dvj's Avatar
dvj (John)
Registered User

dvj is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 755
Something I forgot to ask. Is there a critical mechanical distance between the corrector element and the focus point with the RH200?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-05-2012, 08:50 AM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,681
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-05-2012, 10:17 AM
avandonk's Avatar
avandonk
avandonk

avandonk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 4,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by dvj View Post
Something I forgot to ask. Is there a critical mechanical distance between the corrector element and the focus point with the RH200?
Focus is 115mm behind the rear plate and is fixed as the corrector is fixed.

Only the primary mirror needs to be aligned for collimation.

Bert
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-05-2012, 10:19 AM
bmitchell82's Avatar
bmitchell82 (Brendan)
Newtonian power! Love it!

bmitchell82 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Mandurah
Posts: 2,597
That seems to have done the trick bert! don't you just love it when the fix is just so so simple.

Hopefully the fix for the weather in melbourne is the same! hahaha
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-05-2012, 12:45 PM
marco's Avatar
marco (Marco Lorenzi)
Registered User

marco is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 933
Nice Bert, it seems now stars are quite tight, in particularly in the first single image. I see some triangular stars on the stack, not sure if it is a problem of tracking or registering the images, however the speed of this scope is impressive, I believe you will have lots of fun with..

Cheers
Marco
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-05-2012, 04:18 PM
gregbradley's Avatar
gregbradley
Registered User

gregbradley is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 18,183
Great job Bert. I have found adapters not fully seated as a very common cause of out of whack stars on my setups.

That's impressive because your camera's sensor is larger than the spec for the scope.

I think those few odd stars long the top middle are brief larger guide errors or they are unresolved double stars. Probably a blip on your guiding where the guide errors went to 2 or 3 for a few secs.

Greg.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement