#1  
Old 01-03-2012, 07:59 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Ngc2442

Hi I have grown impatient with the weather and decided to process this with a fraction of the data I wanted.
The Meat Hook Galaxy was taken with my 18" f4.5 Newtonian using aQHY9m camera, LRGB was 50,30,30,40 minutes -30 c 2x2 binning.
Clear skies Ken.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc2442final.jpg)
171.6 KB112 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-03-2012, 08:02 PM
Ross G
Registered User

Ross G is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cherrybrook, NSW
Posts: 5,013
A beautiful galaxy photo Ken.

I bet the final photo will be amazing.

Ross.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-03-2012, 08:12 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Thanks Ross but I think I will be a old man before I see clear skies again.
Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-03-2012, 09:24 PM
strongmanmike's Avatar
strongmanmike (Michael)
Highest Observatory in Oz

strongmanmike is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canberra
Posts: 17,680
Another great galaxy shot Ken, once again with a real sense of distance to it.

Re the shortish exposures, the power of a big fast Newt shines through there

Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-03-2012, 09:45 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Thanks Mike, your right big and fast is good. Hope to do some Galaxy test shots with a focal reducer working at f3.3 over the standard f4.5.
Clear Skies Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2012, 12:11 AM
COSMOPARADISE's Avatar
COSMOPARADISE (Nick)
Nick Ulich

COSMOPARADISE is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ARUNDEL, GOLD COAST
Posts: 151
Nice Ken. I tried this baby not long ago and got to much skyglow to be any good. Great detail.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-03-2012, 09:05 AM
Lester's Avatar
Lester
Registered User

Lester is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: E.P. S.A.
Posts: 4,963
Very nice detailed view Ken. The 18" resolves a lot.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-03-2012, 01:21 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Thanks Nick, I am lucky to have dark skies but I had to move away from Sydney to make it happen. Thanks Lester yes it is hard to beat cubic inches unless you have a big stack of rectangular dollars, actually the old mirror coating is so thin these days you can see through it.
Clear Skies Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-03-2012, 11:22 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,783
What a great photo.
What mount do you use to guide such an 18" beast?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2012, 07:40 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Thanks Alpal, the mount is a home made fork using a dob driver and stepper motors for movement. Argo navis finds my way, it is no paramount but I don't have to do a meridian flip.
Clear skies Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2012, 08:17 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken View Post
Thanks Alpal, the mount is a home made fork using a dob driver and stepper motors for movement. Argo navis finds my way, it is no paramount but I don't have to do a meridian flip.
Clear skies Ken.
Thanks Ken,
do you have a focuser rotater to stop frame rotation?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2012, 09:55 PM
allan gould's Avatar
allan gould
Registered User

allan gould is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,485
Ken
That's a great image, with lovely small ones in the field. Really love the detail and colour. Hmmmm big and fast you say - Just can't afford another scope.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-03-2012, 10:30 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Alpal no rotater is needed because it is a equatorial fork mount, but one would be handy to find guide stars for the Loadstar.
Allan there is nothing wrong with that R.C. of yours.
Clear skies Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-03-2012, 10:37 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Ken, nicely done. waiting to see some pics of your mount as well
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-03-2012, 07:57 PM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
As requested some shots of my setup.
Clear skies Ken.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (SAM_0598small.jpg)
75.1 KB20 views
Click for full-size image (SAM_0599small.jpg)
72.6 KB18 views
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-03-2012, 08:38 PM
alistairsam's Avatar
alistairsam
Registered User

alistairsam is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Box Hill North, Vic
Posts: 1,838
Thanks Ken, that's very impressive.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-03-2012, 12:58 AM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,783
Thanks Ken for showing us the pics of the mount.
I was wondering how people guide such large telescopes.
Looks like you've done a good job to tame such a big 18 inch beast.

How long was each subframe?
You only give total times.

Last edited by alpal; 08-03-2012 at 01:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-03-2012, 11:32 AM
Ken
Registered User

Ken is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Wattle Ponds via Singleton
Posts: 365
Hi Alpal the subframes are 10 min. on that shot but I also use up to 20 mins on very faint targets. If I use the ed80 guidescope I am limited to 5 mins because of flexure, so all the images these days are with the Orion or TSA oag.
Clear skies Ken.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-03-2012, 01:12 PM
alpal's Avatar
alpal
Registered User

alpal is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,783
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken View Post
Hi Alpal the subframes are 10 min. on that shot but I also use up to 20 mins on very faint targets. If I use the ed80 guidescope I am limited to 5 mins because of flexure, so all the images these days are with the Orion or TSA oag.
Clear skies Ken.

Thanks - they are long exposures.
I use a TS9 OAG too.

cheers
Alpal
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement