DP, yep 90 seconds @ 5fps, giving me approx 450 frames in each channel (after splitting them), and I stacked about 350 of each channel before recombining in AstraImage.
I wanted to do 10fps to give me more frames, but I'm hopeful that if the seeing is good, the detail @ 5fps will be better, and even if only a handful of frames are stacked it will hopefully give a better result. If that new firmware turns out to compress better, then maybe 10fps will be the way to go.
This shot is a composite, with the first run aligned on the planet (separate rgb), and the second run aligned on Io (one shot colour). I'm going to try aligning on Io in separate RGB to see if it reduces the smudgey look.
I lost the moon as well using ppmcentre, but I ended up using -width=640 -height=480 -cutx=600 to keep the moon in frame.
Paul, I usually process harder but I've taken to liking a more natural, softer looking processing so that I'm not introducing artifacts by oversharpening.
Quote:
but I guess you want to keep that a secret
|
hmm, yeh right.. I've already explained the step by step procedure on the forum, and to a few people in person at Lostock. I'm sure if you asked a specific question about it there'd be a few that can answer it. Anyway when you get your DMK you won't need to worry about that step as you'll already be capturing in separate RGB.
Robert/David, I'm sure we'll see quite a few images this apparition with detail on Io and/or ganymede. With the advances in camera technology and the huge focal length that the experts are imaging at these days, it's almost a given that we'll see something spectacular this year.
Thanks for your comments.