#1  
Old 14-03-2011, 10:44 PM
h45e (Anthony)
Registered User

h45e is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 128
Is bigger better???

I am wondering if a 6" scope is better than a 8" scope? I'm planing to do some astro photography for dso's.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14-03-2011, 11:40 PM
barx1963's Avatar
barx1963 (Malcolm)
Bright the hawk's flight

barx1963 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mt Duneed Vic
Posts: 3,982
All other things being equal, bigger is better. Having said that, probably morew details is needed as to how you are planning to use scope to answer a query for imaging work. EG waht mount are you planning to use? What are you planning to image? What camera do you have?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15-03-2011, 12:05 AM
h45e (Anthony)
Registered User

h45e is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 128
I was thinking of

Meade LS 8" Advanced Coma-Free LightSwitch telescope

Or

Meade LS 6" Advanced Coma-Free LightSwitch telescope

Or

Celestron 8 Inch CPC 800 XLT Schmidt-Cassegrain Telescope
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15-03-2011, 12:23 AM
OICURMT's Avatar
OICURMT
Oh, I See You Are Empty!

OICURMT is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Laramie, WY - United States of America
Posts: 1,555
I'd question the ability for the LS's to support very much on a single arm...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15-03-2011, 12:56 AM
mswhin63's Avatar
mswhin63 (Malcolm)
Registered User

mswhin63 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Para Hills, South Australia
Posts: 3,622
for deep sky you will need equatorial mounting. Each of the scopes that you have looked at are all ALT/AZ mounts and won't be able to carry out long exposures due to field rotation.

If you can get a wedge for any of those three then it may then be possible to do deep sky.

Most imaging is done using Equatorial mounts although Cassegrain scopes can be fitted with Field de-rotators to compensate although they are quite expensive.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16-03-2011, 12:32 PM
gary
Registered User

gary is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Mt. Kuring-Gai
Posts: 5,999
Consider F-ratio in specs too

Quote:
Originally Posted by h45e View Post
I'm planing to do some astro photography for dso's.
Another extremely important attribute of a telescope being used to photograph
extended DSO's is its "speed".

If you divide the focal length of the scope by its effective aperture, you will
obtain a dimensionless number referred to as an F-number. The F-number is
synonymous with the "speed" of the optics and the smaller the number
the "faster" the optics are said to be.

For DSO's, the faster the optics, the shorter the exposure time required
and the less noise in the image.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 16-03-2011, 08:31 PM
h45e (Anthony)
Registered User

h45e is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Perth, WA
Posts: 128
I want to use those two scopes, but i honestly dont know which one to get..

I want bang for buck but I also want my friends to enjoy the wonders that is the universe.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17-03-2011, 09:14 AM
ZeroID's Avatar
ZeroID (Brent)
Lost in Space ....

ZeroID is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Auckland, NZ
Posts: 4,949
For visual bigger is always better so 8" will outgun 6' obviously. But Astrophotography has different needs and an Alt/Az Dob LS is not the choice for long exposure DSO requirements.
I'd go with the 8" Celestron as best call and wedge it later for photography but be warned its a long hard expensive path as I am finding out ..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 07:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement