#1  
Old 30-01-2020, 03:10 PM
etill (Elliot)
Registered User

etill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 144
Ngc2070

I decided to try the Tarantula nebula again last night. It may have been a bit hot for the 5 minute exposures, or maybe the object is a bit bright.

I also started dithering between every second exposure, but set it up wrong so about a third of them started before phd2 finished settling down and had to be discarded.

22 x 5min subs, ISO800
Canon 60D unmodified
Vixen 200mm at F/4, CGEM
I ended up with more flats and darks than the lights, so just used 20 of each.

All processed in PixInsight. It's still pretty noisy but it was much worse to begin with.

The first attempt at this is here, different framing though: https://www.astrobin.com/9i15t8/0/

I'm not sure which is better or which I prefer yet.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (ngc2070.jpg)
202.3 KB21 views
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30-01-2020, 03:16 PM
casstony
Registered User

casstony is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Warragul, Vic
Posts: 4,494
I like the astrobin image Elliot - nice and sharp. IIS degrades the image though so it can be hard to tell.
It's a lot harder to get a decent broadband image of the Tarantula than some of the other bright nebulae.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30-01-2020, 03:20 PM
etill (Elliot)
Registered User

etill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 144
Thanks, I'm going to pull the filter out of the canon as it's only used for this now. Then perhaps try some suitable filters with that. The heat is a real struggle at the moment, I'd like to get something cooled and be done with it, which would probably be mono, but I need more practice with what I have first.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30-01-2020, 04:15 PM
Saturnine (Jeff)
Registered User

Saturnine is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 2,300
The Astrobin image is certainly much better detail. A fine image with nice detail in the heart of the Tarantula.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30-01-2020, 05:15 PM
etill (Elliot)
Registered User

etill is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 144
Thanks, I had thought I was a bit heavy handed with the HDR and contrast enhancement processing in the first one.

I think I like the framing better in this one, I was trying to get some of the clusters and smaller nebulosity more evenly represented. This second one has a lot less processing other than the noise reduction which I was trying out in two phases (one with the linear data and a touch up after stretching).

I was planning a first attempt at a properly framed mosiac (3x3 of the SMC) using NINA tonight, but I just went outside to check out the conditions and its 40 odd at the moment so that may not work out well.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 30-01-2020, 10:57 PM
Ant0nio's Avatar
Ant0nio (Tony)
Quid Clarius Astris

Ant0nio is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Gympie,Qld. Australia
Posts: 441
Lovely image Elliot, as others have already mentioned the Astrobin version is noticeably much better.
Cheers,
Tony
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 08:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement