Go Back   IceInSpace > General Astronomy > General Chat

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 28-12-2016, 05:48 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Deep field anyone?

Has anyone here done an equivalent to the Hubble deep field?
Or have you thought of trying?
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28-12-2016, 05:58 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Rolf has put in a half assed 150 hours on the Antlia cluster...

No commitment, I say.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28-12-2016, 06:13 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
For next year I have planned a 300 hour project BUT it is due to the number of panels more than time on any individual target. So no. I would like to but it would probably be best done with a larger instrument than my 5.1" refractor.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28-12-2016, 06:34 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
I am hoping to be fully operational by Winter. Dark skies, clear nights and its a given I'll be trying something... Cant wait.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28-12-2016, 07:25 PM
SimmoW's Avatar
SimmoW (SIMON)
Farting Nebulae

SimmoW is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Tamleugh, Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,410
Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne View Post
Rolf has put in a half assed 150 hours on the Antlia cluster...

No commitment, I say.
Too funny!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 29-12-2016, 11:50 AM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Hubble pointed at a tiny patch of southern sky in repeat visits (made over the past decade) for a total of 50 days, with a total exposure time of 2 million seconds. More than 2,000 images of the same field were taken with Hubble's two premier cameras -; the Advanced Camera for Surveys and the Wide Field Camera 3, which extends Hubble's vision into near-infrared light -; and combined to make the XDF.

"The XDF is the deepest image of the sky ever obtained and reveals the faintest and most distant galaxies ever seen. XDF allows us to explore further back in time than ever before," said Garth Illingworth of the University of California at Santa Cruz, principal investigator of the Hubble Ultra Deep Field 2009 (HUDF09) program.


With my 30 hours invested into the Tarantula Nebula I'm about...5% there...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29-12-2016, 04:42 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Could a group get together all do time on the target and all images stacked building an image with unheard of exposure time.
Should be pretty easy other than agreeing what to target.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:10 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Could a group get together all do time on the target and all images stacked building an image with unheard of exposure time.
Should be pretty easy other than agreeing what to target.
Alex
Yep... bags M42

We need another picture of M42... it's woefully under represented in amateur circles. imho)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:13 PM
Atmos's Avatar
Atmos (Colin)
Ultimate Noob

Atmos is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 7,013
Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne View Post
Yep... bags M42

We need another picture of M42... it's woefully under represented in amateur circles. imho)
What about banding together to tackle some of the propylids in M42?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:22 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by xelasnave View Post
Could a group get together all do time on the target and all images stacked building an image with unheard of exposure time.
Should be pretty easy other than agreeing what to target.
Alex
GREAT IDEA! Once I can contribute, I might run with this... Wouldn't do M42, partly because its done to death and partly obscured from my site, but something deep south... That has some serious possibilities.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:26 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Here is our benchmark: https://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic0601a/
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:28 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
GREAT IDEA! Once I can contribute, I might run with this... Wouldn't do M42, partly because its done to death and partly obscured from my site, but something deep south... That has some serious possibilities.
I also have obstructed views, but could possibly help with an object deep south.

What about NGC 1763? I'm currently working on this target: http://www.astrobin.com/273012/D/?nc=user
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29-12-2016, 05:31 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by el_draco View Post
Wouldn't do M42, partly because its done to death
Pretty much my point.... perhaps it is time for us to (collectively) realise that no matter how hard we whack that old piñata... there's probably not more than a stale minty or two left in that old papier mâché carcass.

Last edited by clive milne; 29-12-2016 at 06:17 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:04 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
I am surprised that we did not just get a list of all the tech problems that would prevent such a project but hopefully in the world of digital all will be possible.
Well next step let's make a list and boundaries.
Something Hubble can't see.
An object or a dark place and see how far back we can go, So far South folk in the Northern Hemi won't be able to replicate it.
Objects in either of the clouds maybe.
Time to speculate.
Or an object that North and South can image so it can be a world wide undertaking.
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:29 PM
JA
.....

JA is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by clive milne View Post
Pretty much my point.... perhaps it is time for us to (collectively) realise that no matter how hard we whack that old piñata... there's probably not more than a stale minty or two left in that old papier mâché carcass.
I had to chuckle Clive - great commentary style

Best
JA
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:33 PM
rmuhlack's Avatar
rmuhlack (Richard)
Professional Nerd

rmuhlack is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Strathalbyn, SA
Posts: 979
I too have thought about undertaking such a project, and Rolf's Antlia is certainly a benchmark for sure. A galaxy cluster (as per the Hubble deep field images) is (IMHO) a more appropriate target for such a project than a nebula region.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:40 PM
Slawomir's Avatar
Slawomir (Suavi)
Registered User

Slawomir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North Queensland
Posts: 3,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmuhlack View Post
I too have thought about undertaking such a project, and Rolf's Antlia is certainly a benchmark for sure. A galaxy cluster (as per the Hubble deep field images) is (IMHO) a more appropriate target for such a project than a nebula region.
True, but having a galaxy cluster as a target would automatically exclude from the project those of us living too close to the city (heavy light pollution) or with telescopes not suitable for RGB imaging, such as mass produced doublets for example. I tick both boxes

Perhaps a vote or some sort of expression of interest would help to see who would like to really take part in such project?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:48 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by JA View Post
I had to chuckle Clive - great commentary style

Best
JA
Glad you appreciate my sense of humour...


not all do.

best
~c
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:51 PM
el_draco (Rom)
Politically incorrect.

el_draco is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tasmania (South end)
Posts: 2,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmuhlack View Post
I too have thought about undertaking such a project, and Rolf's Antlia is certainly a benchmark for sure. A galaxy cluster (as per the Hubble deep field images) is (IMHO) a more appropriate target for such a project than a nebula region.
Thats what I have in mind.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 29-12-2016, 06:54 PM
clive milne
Registered User

clive milne is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Freo WA
Posts: 1,443
Being serious for a second here... what about a galactic cirrus survey?

Pretty much anyone with a CCD camera, basic lens, rudimentary skills, equatorial mount and a dark sky could contribute... data reduction I will leave to Ray.
... he's a machine ... T5000 prototype I'm guessing. (and I mean that with the greatest respect)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement