#1  
Old 18-02-2007, 12:28 PM
Shawn
Mostly Harmless

Shawn is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cairns
Posts: 1,349
Money No Matter

What imaging device would you buy....

S
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18-02-2007, 12:49 PM
merlin8r's Avatar
merlin8r
Astro Shop Minion

merlin8r is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mount Colah
Posts: 190
The Hubble Space Telescope!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18-02-2007, 12:56 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Thats easy..the most expensive one I could find . I saw a huge 160 meg cam the size of a brief case on the net if over kill is the game that would be it.
There is a canon 16 meg for about $11,000 if they have it in a nikon (ccd sensor)that sounds juicey .
alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18-02-2007, 01:01 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
If Money was not a concern right now I would get the QHY8, at about 2000$ its going to put SBIG out of business. Really why pay 8000$ USD and more for the same camera?
Alex I am sure you could get the same 16meg Chip put into a QHY made camera for less. There is a 14mp CMOS version QHY are investigating.

Regards
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18-02-2007, 01:05 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Maybe just go for 39 meg

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06...selbladh3d.asp

sell the house and you probably have enough for the deposit
alex
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18-02-2007, 01:14 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Fahim I must say I agree his products are relatively cheap if you want a dedicated astro cam I have followed his work for a long time and certainly if I go to a dedicated cam I would buy from him . I met him some time ago in another forum and suggested he add cooling to what he was doing at the time I dont know if I was trying to place an idea he already had but it certainly is now a reality. He has come a long way in a relatively short time. I think a few members now own one and they would be better to offer comment however.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 18-02-2007, 01:16 PM
xelasnave's Avatar
xelasnave
Gravity does not Suck

xelasnave is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Tabulam
Posts: 17,003
Shawn there are two chip models out there but very expensive and I guess that says something. It would be great not to have to have a guide scope.
alex
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18-02-2007, 02:31 PM
Omaroo's Avatar
Omaroo (Chris Malikoff)
Let there be night...

Omaroo is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hobart, TAS
Posts: 7,639
A few years ago I bought a "flying spot CCD" camera for our art department. It was a JVC camera that somehow vibrated the CCD array, and timed exposures were fired at either end of the oscillation, which effectively doubled the physical resolution of the array. Back then (1998 or so) it was up around the $64k mark (if I remember at all correctly). Damn finest camera there was for years. Does anyone remember them?

Last edited by Omaroo; 18-02-2007 at 05:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-02-2007, 04:58 PM
74tuc
Registered User

74tuc is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sandy Creek(Sth.Aust.)
Posts: 153
Money no object ?

I would buy the Alta U16 byApogee.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-02-2007, 06:00 PM
Striker's Avatar
Striker (Tony)
Whats visual Astronomy

Striker is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,062
Quote:
If Money was not a concern right now I would get the QHY8, at about 2000$ its going to put SBIG out of business. Really why pay 8000$ USD and more for the same camera?
I agree the cooled QHY8 camera sounds like good value for DSLR imaging but you honestly cant compare this camera to a dedicated monochrome Sbig or any other dedicated CCD camera, they have completely different chips and simply can not be be compared with each other....there about as close as comparing a Toucam to a DSLR.

On this topic I would buy a huge RC on a paramount...and a back illuminated ccd camera...should get some change out of $100,000.....I hope
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-02-2007, 06:55 PM
netwolf's Avatar
netwolf
Registered User

netwolf is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,949
Tony,

From what I have read here and on CN the chips are in the same category as the SBIG's. You can get BW chips as well. He has just posted about a QHY11 using a 10MP CCD http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?topic=127.0

Check out the images being taken with these cameras.
http://qhyccd.com/ccdbbs/index.php?board=1.0

SBIG Cameras are overpriced. If one compares the cost of the CCD sensor vs the cost of the manufactured unit there is a very very large gap.

Regards
Fahim
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time is now 10:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.7 | Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertisement
Bintel
Advertisement