Thread: EQ6-R vs HEQ5
View Single Post
  #15  
Old 03-12-2017, 03:21 AM
brian nordstrom (As avatar)
Registered User

brian nordstrom is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth WA
Posts: 4,374
aPPLES VRS oRANGES
Cap lock OFF .


I have and use my Celestron Ci700 ,
a G11 .


People said the same things in 1989 about G11's and Ci700's
,
Guess what , my Ci700 is still going strong ,
as is a few old ( Yes You ) mates G11's
are still as good as the day they were opened .

For your information the tripod legs in this photo are 3 inches ( 76mm ) in dianeter .


Personally a good HEQ5 would be as good as an EQ6 for what you want ( NEED ) .

Brian
Quote:
Originally Posted by codemonkey View Post
Context is everything, Peter. The subject at hand is Skywatcher HEQ5 vs EQ6-R. We're not talking Astro-physics mounts. I would not be at all surprised to hear that a belt outperforms a spur gear in low-end mounts.

For the OP, out of these two I'd be inclined to go with the EQ6-R. I'd also second Dunk's recommendation of a short tube refractor. You'll get much better results much faster going down this route than going down the Newt / Mak-newt path.

Astrophotography is a challenging hobby, you'll be challenged enough starting out.... refractors essentially either work or not, and if not, you send them back. Mirror-based scopes require a *lot* of tweaking.
Attached Thumbnails
Click for full-size image (WP_20170106_19_34_49_Pro (2).jpg)
209.3 KB95 views
Reply With Quote