View Single Post
  #123  
Old 02-10-2017, 11:43 AM
Camelopardalis's Avatar
Camelopardalis (Dunk)
Drifting from the pole

Camelopardalis is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by peter_4059 View Post
That's what I suspected. I guess the trade off then is in image processing time?

Is it possible to get the same depth in an image with many short exposures vs fewer longer ones?
1) processing time - depends on the capabilities of your computer. Registration and Integration is multithreaded in PixInsight now, so a modest quad core and a solid state drive works wonders

2) depth - so long as your images are sky limited, stacking many short images should still amount to a similar numerical result. If a photon arrives from a faint part of an object every 10 minutes and you take 10 minute subs, over the course of an hour you collect 6 photons. With 1 minute subs you still collect 6 photons in the same time...
Reply With Quote