OK.....last question regarding this thread.....Sorry
Comparing the Meade LX200 series to the Celestron advanced series C-9 1/4 SGT with the CG-5 mount...plus the GPS ad on.
1)What are the benifits over these 2 different mounts?
2)Wouldn't the EQ mount be better then having additional cost for a wedge in the Meade or celestron Nexstar GPS Range?
3)Potability should be easier then the fork mount?
4)For the same dollars would you consider the C-11" SGT with the GPS ad on to the Meade LX200 10".
Celestron C-11 SGT
Celestron C-9 1/4 SGT
Meade LX200 8" 10"
I know their both great scopes...and I am prefering the Meade at this stage but the Celestron advance series has caught my eye and then I can also purchase localy.
I am mainly intersted in comments about the mounts....
Positive and negative feedback welcome.