View Single Post
  #13  
Old 13-09-2017, 01:44 PM
Andy01's Avatar
Andy01 (Andy)
My God it's full of stars

Andy01 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by alocky View Post
Hi Greg - my take on that piece of advice was that since Andy already owns the camera (v. expensive) and mount (also expensive) he should use the Barlow (cheap) to see if (1) his mount is up to guiding at long focal length, and (2) what the image scale and local seeing delivers at around 1.2m focal length before buying a new imaging ota (v. expensive) that may require another mount (v expensive) or camera.
I don't think anyone was suggesting it as an alternative final solution!
Cheers
Andrew.
Hey Andrew, Thanks for clearing that up - I was browsing the Bintel website looking at 2x Barlows/Powermates today, but I'm uncertain which to get.

Televue? Powermate Other? Presumably they have screw threads at each end for affixing between the scope/flattener/camera

I'm assuming a barlow/powermate will slow the system down by a stop at least, so I'm guessing my 770mm f7.0 refractor becomes f8 or 9 @ 1540mm FL? That seems comparable to some of the affordable RC type scopes, and it's only a few hunderd bucks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by glend View Post
I will throw in another suggestion, the Skywatcher MN190 Mak-Newt. Its 1000mm fl and f5,3 so good enough and fast enough for DSOs. It does not need a coma corrector as it has a great front corrector, so its flat field and there are no diffraction spikes as the secondary is mounted on the corrector. Fully baffled, images compare to larger APOs, and it produces true colour rendition. I have had one for years now and will not part with it. The stock focuser is just adequate for imaging with a DSLR but with your camera (and mine), the Moonlight upgrade is recommended (Ron makes a special adaptor kit for the MN190). Its more expensive than a GSO imaging newt of the same size, and heavier (due to the corrector) but well balanced.
Current price is around $1699 from Andrews.
You would need a NEQ6 as a minimum for imaging with it, but with your camera i would suggest a heavier payload mount, i use a CGX these days.
Just my 2 cents. Note i have APOs and Newts, but the MN190 is the easiest to use as you don't need to worrying about reducer correctors, flatteners, or coma correctors - just stick the camera in the focuser and your in business.
Thanks Glen, that's a very positive rap for a beast I know next to nothing about! Not sure I want to spend big $ upgrading my mount, OTA on this project yet, but good to know what's out there.
Reply With Quote