View Single Post
  #5  
Old 02-08-2021, 11:31 PM
PKay's Avatar
PKay (Peter)
Registered User

PKay is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: DEPOT BEACH
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamJL View Post
Hi Peter
300s is a good point for this nebula, depending on where you're shooting from. This is nice work! Your stars are a little unfocused, but you're off to a cracking start
Looking forward to seeing what you get out of this one.
Thanks Adam, the focus may have been excessive moisture, I use an EAF.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Startrek View Post
Peter,
Yes a great start but if you were out last night after the rain cleared, seeing and transparency were terrible as humidity was up around 85 to 90% and looking up stars looked like they had halos around them. I didn’t bother imaging as focusing would have been frustrating
Good start anyway
Core looks good and well detailed but outer region looks a bit dark which is hiding a lot of detail and nebulosity
I use 180sec subs for nebula and lots of them with my 2600MC and L Extreme, a sweet spot , I’ve never had to go to 300sec to expose detail
Look forward to your end result
Cheers
M
Thanks M, yes it was so wet I had to pull out the hair dryer (which lives in the observatory).
Might give 180s a go and see what difference it makes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilsil View Post
Hi Peter, nice image.
I am using the 300s for my imaging as well.
The QHY268M works really well with that exposure.
I must say that I haven't tried any longer.
Thanks Wilco, there is so much written about exposure time, I have found the 'suck it an see' principle works the best
Reply With Quote